I assume FRIAM folks want to increase their knowledge - or mebbe not.
Credentials: I have supervised wind tunnel tests of vehicles in arrays at USC and made extensive theoretical calcs with grad students on this subject, have tested my own designs (the Sunraycer and GM Impact) in the Caltech tunnel and the GM tunnel, and probed the wakes. I have driven instrumented test vehicles in the wake of bluff bodies at a decommissioned airfield in CA, at our test base at El Mirage Dry Lake, CA, and the GM Proving grounds in AZ. It's pretty hairy. I hold the patents on two truck drag reduction airshields.
Here's the received knowledge, that I take to be correct:
There is NO SUCH THING AS A BOW WAVE in incompressible continuum flows. The field equations are elliptic, won't permit same, and Nature agrees! Bodies in a fluid stream create a wake of low energy flow that trails behind (but NOT as a CYLINDER!). Statements that wake pathlines are longer than in undisturbed flow are correct. The idea that this somehow forces the flow to go faster is VOODOO fluid mechanics that I didn't know was still accepted. Wake flows are actually much slower than freestream. Said wake contains a lower energy flow, and lotsa turbulence. It extends for about 12 scale lengths astern of the body, until re-energzied by turbulent entrainment from the surrounding flow. The drag of a body immersed in this wake is significantly reduced (but not the drag coefficient). For bluff bodies like cars, bikes or peoples the velocity deficit of the wake is very pronounced. The wake is influenced by ground effect (unlike the prop turbine case), and is very turbulent, with eddies of about the same as the body scale, especially when the body does no work on the flow, as is the case with bikes etc. There are no "lifting" components here (at least in the correct, nonFRIAM, use of the word), but severe crosswind disturbances usually occur.
These wake effects are used to great advantage in peletons and in drafting for formula race cars. And also by crazy people (like one of my professional drivers, since killed!) for fun behind trailers on freeways.
There's no mystery about anything in this sort of array interference, except the apparently eternal riddle of turbulence.
I'll be glad to answer further questions, if I know the answer!
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
[hidden email] wrote:
> > There is NO SUCH THING AS A BOW WAVE in incompressible continuum flows. > Wind farms only involve incompressible flows? ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |