Simulation Languages

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Simulation Languages

Mike Oliker
> Out of curiosity, how many people here do simulations in a high level
> language (e.g. Java or C++) vs. a very high level language
> (like Ruby,
> Python or perl)?

Matlab.
-Mike Oliker



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Simulation Languages

James Steiner
> Out of curiosity, how many people here do simulations in a high level
> language (e.g. Java or C++) vs. a very high level language
> (like Ruby, Python or perl)?

I only use NetLogo at the moment, but now that I've seen Processing
(which seems to be very similar to C, but with many helper methods and
a specialized IDE), Im eager to get into it for those ABMs beyond NL's
scope.

~~James


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Simulation Languages

Roger Critchlow-2
I'll use anything that works, which has included Fortran, Pascal, C,
Java, Tcl, Python, StarLogo, NetLogo, Repast, Ascape, Swarm, Scheme,
and my own programming languages at various times and places.  I've
threatened to use C++ and Delphi, but the threat has never
materialized.

-- rec --

On 11/21/05, James Steiner <gregortroll at gmail.com> wrote:

> > Out of curiosity, how many people here do simulations in a high level
> > language (e.g. Java or C++) vs. a very high level language
> > (like Ruby, Python or perl)?
>
> I only use NetLogo at the moment, but now that I've seen Processing
> (which seems to be very similar to C, but with many helper methods and
> a specialized IDE), Im eager to get into it for those ABMs beyond NL's
> scope.
>
> ~~James
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at Mission Cafe
> Wed Lecture schedule, archives, unsubscribe, maps, etc. at http://www.friam.org
>