[ SPAM ] Does Scientific Method Need Revision?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[ SPAM ] Does Scientific Method Need Revision?

Carl Tollander
Spoiler: not thought so, but a nice ride.

https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/does-the-scientific-method-need-revision-d7514e2598f3

C.


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ SPAM ] Does Scientific Method Need Revision?

Owen Densmore
Administrator
My!

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Carl Tollander <[hidden email]> wrote:
Spoiler: not thought so, but a nice ride.

https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/does-the-scientific-method-need-revision-d7514e2598f3

C.


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ SPAM ] Does Scientific Method Need Revision?

Barry MacKichan
In reply to this post by Carl Tollander
In view of Betteridge's law, not really a spoiler.

—Barry




On 17 Dec 2014, at 20:15, Carl Tollander wrote:

> Spoiler: not thought so, but a nice ride.
>
> https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/does-the-scientific-method-need-revision-d7514e2598f3
>
> C.
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ SPAM ] Does Scientific Method Need Revision?

cody dooderson
I'm not an expert in physics but it does seem that whats not testable today might be easy to test tomorrow. At some point string theory or the multiverse might be tested experimentally. 

Cody Smith

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Barry MacKichan <[hidden email]> wrote:
In view of Betteridge's law, not really a spoiler.

—Barry





On 17 Dec 2014, at 20:15, Carl Tollander wrote:

Spoiler: not thought so, but a nice ride.

https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/does-the-scientific-method-need-revision-d7514e2598f3

C.


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com