Rule 2 and Epigensis

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Rule 2 and Epigensis

Nick Thompson
Doug,

This is the second time this rule has been offered as a rule of FRIAM in a
way that might confuse folks.

PH wrote ===>Seems to me that everything from epigenetic gene regulation
changes to
> horizontal gene transfer is happening at the bacterial level.. <===
 
In response , Doug Wrote

===> You know, not to sound too harshly judgmental, or anything, ...
But: you do seem to be in direct violation of rule #2 of the FRIAM posting
guidelines which, like rule #1 reads
 
"*Second **rule of FRIAM: no one talks about specifics*."<=====

I dont think it is a rule, but if it were one, I would say it is a terrible
one and we should change it.  Without the details and the examples, we are
confined to the world of ideological blather.

So, I would hope that we could pool our technical resources and come to a
common view on the assertion made above.  Much of the research that has
been done on epigenetic gene regulation has indeed been done on bacteria!
Does that mean that it has few implications for our understanding of macro
organisms?  Discuss.  Defend your answer with specifics.   It's a great
question and I would hate to see people scared a way from trying to answer
it.

Nick  




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rule 2 and Epigensis

Douglas Roberts-2
Nick,

It appears as if you suggesting, specifically, that we should change *two* rules (#1 as well as #2), unwritten though they both be. 

Let me just tell you that if rewriting these two unwritten rules will release us from the world of ideological blather that has become the FRIAM list's hallmark, I say let the rewriting commence.

Fear not, in any event.  It is impossible to scare FRIAM'ers away from posting to the list.

--Doug

On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Nicholas Thompson <[hidden email]> wrote:
Doug,

This is the second time this rule has been offered as a rule of FRIAM in a
way that might confuse folks.

PH wrote ===>Seems to me that everything from epigenetic gene regulation
changes to
> horizontal gene transfer is happening at the bacterial level.. <===

In response , Doug Wrote

===> You know, not to sound too harshly judgmental, or anything, ...
But: you do seem to be in direct violation of rule #2 of the FRIAM posting
guidelines which, like rule #1 reads

"*Second **rule of FRIAM: no one talks about specifics*."<=====

I dont think it is a rule, but if it were one, I would say it is a terrible
one and we should change it.  Without the details and the examples, we are
confined to the world of ideological blather.

So, I would hope that we could pool our technical resources and come to a
common view on the assertion made above.  Much of the research that has
been done on epigenetic gene regulation has indeed been done on bacteria!
Does that mean that it has few implications for our understanding of macro
organisms?  Discuss.  Defend your answer with specifics.   It's a great
question and I would hate to see people scared a way from trying to answer
it.

Nick




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rule 2 and Epigensis

Phil Henshaw-2

But then if you rewrite unwritten rules #1 and #2 would you then also rewrite unwritten rules #3 and #4, which as I seem to observe say there’s always some exception to rules #1 and #2 in case you have anything particular to say, so long as you leave openings for those who may wish to read nothing in particular into it.     I think 3 & 4, if I’m right that they exist, are very useful…!

 

Phil

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Douglas Roberts
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 4:04 PM
To: [hidden email]; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Rule 2 and Epigensis

 

Nick,

It appears as if you suggesting, specifically, that we should change *two* rules (#1 as well as #2), unwritten though they both be. 

Let me just tell you that if rewriting these two unwritten rules will release us from the world of ideological blather that has become the FRIAM list's hallmark, I say let the rewriting commence.

Fear not, in any event.  It is impossible to scare FRIAM'ers away from posting to the list.

--Doug

On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Nicholas Thompson <[hidden email]> wrote:

Doug,

This is the second time this rule has been offered as a rule of FRIAM in a
way that might confuse folks.

PH wrote ===>Seems to me that everything from epigenetic gene regulation
changes to
> horizontal gene transfer is happening at the bacterial level.. <===

In response , Doug Wrote

===> You know, not to sound too harshly judgmental, or anything, ...
But: you do seem to be in direct violation of rule #2 of the FRIAM posting
guidelines which, like rule #1 reads

"*Second **rule of FRIAM: no one talks about specifics*."<=====

I dont think it is a rule, but if it were one, I would say it is a terrible
one and we should change it.  Without the details and the examples, we are
confined to the world of ideological blather.

So, I would hope that we could pool our technical resources and come to a
common view on the assertion made above.  Much of the research that has
been done on epigenetic gene regulation has indeed been done on bacteria!
Does that mean that it has few implications for our understanding of macro
organisms?  Discuss.  Defend your answer with specifics.   It's a great
question and I would hate to see people scared a way from trying to answer
it.

Nick




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rule 2 and Epigensis

Marcus G. Daniels
In reply to this post by Nick Thompson
Nicholas Thompson wrote:
>  
> Much of the research that has
> been done on epigenetic gene regulation has indeed been done on bacteria!
> Does that mean that it has few implications for our understanding of macro
> organisms?

http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/v15/n7/full/5201832a.html
http://www.pnas.org/content/104/32/13056.abstract
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1241672
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0046817701983819
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/112627975/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0 


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org