*Reminder today 11:30a* Wedtech Lecture @ sfComplex: Kenneth Lloyd: Network graph formalism for the study of complex systems

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

*Reminder today 11:30a* Wedtech Lecture @ sfComplex: Kenneth Lloyd: Network graph formalism for the study of complex systems

Stephen Guerin
Please join us this Wednesday at Santa Fe Complex at 11:30a for a talk  
by Kenneth Lloyd on "Network graph formalism for the study of complex  
systems"

After Ken's talk, we'll meander over to El Tesoro Restaurant for  
lunch...

ABSTRACT:
I will introduce the foundation concepts for
a methodology proven useful in developing products and processes of  
dynamically evolving, large-
scale complex systems (DELCS). The methodology is based upon a  
mathematical formalism using
hybrid, network graphs that underly most formal modeling languages  
such as the UML, SysML or
Petri nets. Having identified incompleteness in Traditional Systems  
Engineering’s (TSE) historically
reductionist, machine-model approach, this methodology represents an  
alternative form of systems
engineering using phases of complexification and simplification in  
ameliorating many problematic
effects inherent in the design of complex systems.

While it may seem paradoxical, we specifically utilize these  
complexity characteristics as enabling
agents providing in large-scale systems, and methods that add  
complexity have historically been
considered antithetical to the practice of systems engineering,  
therefore avoided. We term this new
domain Complex Systems Engineering (CSE), and our methodology WattSys.
The guiding principles for the foundations of WattSys are:
1. To model the effects of non-equilibrium system thermodynamics, upon  
structures of energy,
information, entropy, space and time.
2. To consider both temporal dynamics and state models through  
dynamical architecture.
3. To facilitate better congruence with scientific foundations.
4. To facilitate reduction in risk from scientific uncertainty.
5. To provide better navigation, visualization, simulation and  
ultimately a better understanding of
systems through models and data.

The method’s foundation originated in the domains of systems and  
software engineering, but are
reified1 through concepts in complexity theory and complexity science  
as extended from quantum
physics, thermodynamics and statistical mechanics, graph theory and  
inverse theory. These are
implemented as heterotic network models embedded in n-dimensional  
context manifolds extended
in temporal dimensions. The network graphs serve as knowledge models  
that are used to encode,
describe and report information for analysis, to simulate behavior,  
and to provide insight into
alternative patterns. Specifically, the methodology searches the large-
scale networks for small-
world properties, using multiple dimensions of self-similarity in  
discovering navigational paths and
distances. It ‘simplifies’ complexity, not by reduction but  
through resolution by adding these
discoveries as small functional parameters into the network structure  
genotype. Therefore it may
be described a complex meta-system that replicates and evolves complex  
system models using
evolutionary genetic algorithms and historical information in the form  
of data.

It is proposed that these techniques may be utilized for engineering  
such diverse complex dynamical
systems as large-scale software systems, collaboration networks,  
internet fact webs, commercial
enterprises, the national defense, and even ad hoc teams within these  
organizations. It is proposed
better results will be seen compared with using either TSE, game  
theory, forms of regulated self-
organization, highly optimized tolerances, or negotiated group  
consensus, individually.









============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org