*** Recent Articles and Commentaries
Why Is Mathematical Biology So Hard? Michael C. Reed http://www.ams.org/notices/200403/comm-reed.pdf The Poincar? Dodecahedral Space and the Mystery of the Missing Fluctuations Jeffrey Weeks http://www.ams.org/notices/200406/fea-weeks.pdf *** New and old Reviews of the AMS (the American Mathematical Society) Review of SYNC: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order Reviewed by G. Bard Ermentrout http://www.ams.org/notices/200403/fea-ermentrout.pdf Review of the new books from barabasi & watts * Linked: The New Science of Networks * Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age Reviewed by Rick Durrett http://www.ams.org/notices/200402/rev-durrett.pdf Review of Duncan J. Watts' book * Small Worlds Reviewed by Carson C. Chow http://www.ams.org/notices/200008/rev-chow.pdf Review of two books from Chaitin * Exploring Randomness * The Unknowable Reviewed by Panu Raatikainen http://www.ams.org/notices/200109/rev-panu.pdf Stephen Smale: The Mathematician Who Broke the Dimension Barrier Reviewed by Rob Kirby http://www.ams.org/notices/200011/rev-kirby.pdf It Must Be Beautiful: Great Equations of Modern Science Reviewed by William G. Faris http://www.ams.org/notices/200303/rev-faris.pdf A Review of Everything and More Reviewed by Michael Harris http://www.ams.org/notices/200406/rev-harris.pdf A Mathematician Looks at Wolfram's New Kind of Science, Review by Lawrence Gray http://www.ams.org/notices/200302/fea-gray.pdf A new kind of science, by Stephen Wolfram, Wolfram Media, Inc. Reviewed by Steven G. Krantz http://tinyurl.com/33ohx What is .. ..an Operad ? http://www.ams.org/notices/200406/what-is.pdf ..a free lunch ? http://www.ams.org/notices/200405/what-is.pdf ..a Billiard ? http://www.ams.org/notices/200404/what-is.pdf |
Jochen Fromm wrote:
> *** Recent Articles and Commentaries > A great selection, thank you. Via the Santa Fe Public Library periodicals link page, the Directory of Open Access Journals, hosted by the Lund University Libraries, currently lists 1142 journals which are available online without restrictions. http://www.doaj.org/ -- rec -- |
>
> Via the Santa Fe Public Library periodicals link page, the Directory of > Open Access Journals, hosted by the Lund University Libraries, currently > lists 1142 journals which are available online without restrictions. > > http://www.doaj.org/ > Looks interesting. I didn't know that there is an Egyptian Journal of Solids or a Journal of Seventeenth-Century Music ;-) |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Roger Critchlow-2
This reminds me: I've been asked to submit a paper to the Open source
and standards conference on Sept. 12-14 in Phoenix, AZ. I suggested the topic of "Open Source Research". There are a lot of pieces to this, I think. The free access to journals is certainly a large part of this. There is more too, things like access to the data and software behind the papers, enhanced web publishing with wiki comments added to the papers, agent model "docking" projects, and so on. Wikipedia is likely a good example as well, a commons for the basic definitions and formalisms we use. I'd like folks to pass along any ideas and examples they have in this space. This is a bit interesting in this regard: http://creativecommons.org/projects/science/ One weakness we face in this area, I think, is the difficulty of publishing mathematical notation in a widely available fashion. There is the W3C "MathML" effort but it does not seem to have taken off. It would sure be nice to cut/paste an equation and integrate/graph with in commonly available tools. -- Owen Owen Densmore 908 Camino Santander Santa Fe, NM 87505 Cell: 505-570-0168 Home: 505-988-3787 http://backspaces.net On Jul 5, 2004, at 11:47 AM, Roger E Critchlow Jr wrote: > Jochen Fromm wrote: > >> *** Recent Articles and Commentaries > > A great selection, thank you. > > Via the Santa Fe Public Library periodicals link page, the Directory > of Open Access Journals, hosted by the Lund University Libraries, > currently lists 1142 journals which are available online without > restrictions. > > http://www.doaj.org/ > > -- rec -- |
Owen Densmore wrote:
> One weakness we face in this area, I think, is the difficulty of > publishing mathematical notation in a widely available fashion. There > is the W3C "MathML" effort but it does not seem to have taken off. It > would sure be nice to cut/paste an equation and integrate/graph with in > commonly available tools. How would you figure out whether "MathML" had "taken off", given it's of interest to a vanishingly small proportion of the internet population? I hadn't checked in a while, but it turns out that it's implemented in all current Mozilla based releases, ie Mozilla, Netscape, and Firefox, and all that's needed for me to render the test pages at: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/mathml/ is to install a few fonts, courtesy of Wolfram Research. Supported under Windows, Linux, and MacOSX. Actually, check out the implementations page: http://www.w3.org/Math/implementations.html Best from a fast connection as there are a lot of screenshots to download, and last updated 6/19/2004. There's a free Internet Explorer plugin for rendering MathML if you're still playing Redmond Roulette. -- rec -- |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |