Re: Friam Digest, Vol 22, Issue 24

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Friam Digest, Vol 22, Issue 24

Joshua Thorp
Isn't it a contradiction to say GM is safe  " because they [scientists]
know from their own work how robust wild ecologies are in defending
against new genes, no matter how exotic" and then tell us one of the
great uses of GM would be to control invasive species?

--joshua



On Apr 26, 2005, at 11:03 AM, [hidden email] wrote:

> Send Friam mailing list submissions to
> [hidden email]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [hidden email]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [hidden email]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Friam digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Environmental Heresies (Owen Densmore)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:51:34 -0700
> From: Owen Densmore <[hidden email]>
> Subject: [FRIAM] Environmental Heresies
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Friam <[hidden email]>
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> SFI associate Stewart Brand has a nifty article here:
>
> http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/05/05/issue/feature_earth.asp?
> p=0
>
> -- Owen
>
> Owen Densmore - http://backspaces.net - http://redfish.com -
> [hidden email]
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Friam mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>
>
> End of Friam Digest, Vol 22, Issue 24
> *************************************


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Friam Digest, Vol 22, Issue 24

Russell Standish
Not really, but it does tell us that biological control is not a
trivial task. GM will add to the biological control toolkit, but is no
magic bullet.

Cheers

On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 12:23:26PM -0500, Joshua Thorp wrote:

> Isn't it a contradiction to say GM is safe  " because they [scientists]
> know from their own work how robust wild ecologies are in defending
> against new genes, no matter how exotic" and then tell us one of the
> great uses of GM would be to control invasive species?
>
> --joshua
>
>
>
> On Apr 26, 2005, at 11:03 AM, [hidden email] wrote:
>
> >Send Friam mailing list submissions to
> > [hidden email]
> >
> >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > [hidden email]
> >
> >You can reach the person managing the list at

--
*PS: A number of people ask me about the attachment to my email, which
is of type "application/pgp-signature". Don't worry, it is not a
virus. It is an electronic signature, that may be used to verify this
email came from me if you have PGP or GPG installed. Otherwise, you
may safely ignore this attachment.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A/Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 8308 3119 (mobile)
Mathematics                               0425 253119 (")
UNSW SYDNEY 2052                 [hidden email]            
Australia                                http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
            International prefix  +612, Interstate prefix 02
----------------------------------------------------------------------------