RE: spectacles de sons et lumiere
Locked
RE: spectacles de sons et lumiere
 
|
All
I am not sure I realized we were having ithe conversation in pubic either. But it doesnt seem a bad conversation to have... in public. The high bit, as Owen would say, is to contunue making Friam and Wedtech as good for the people who are there as possible. Better to get us all to move out there with you, than to move you to us. Keep Jerusalem and Dublin vibrant: Chicago and Boston will take care of themselves. That is the word from the Friam diaspora. Nick Nicholas S. Thompson Professor of Psychology and Ethology Clark University [hidden email] http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/ [hidden email] > [Original Message] > From: <[hidden email]> > To: <[hidden email]> > Date: 8/8/2005 9:38:05 PM > Subject: Friam Digest, Vol 26, Issue 5 > > Send Friam mailing list submissions to > [hidden email] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [hidden email] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [hidden email] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Friam digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Multimedia Stunts for Friam/WedTech (Owen Densmore) > 2. Re: Multimedia Stunts for Friam/WedTech (J T Johnson) > 3. RE: Friam Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 (Nicholas Thompson) > 4. Re: RE: Friam Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 (J T Johnson) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 18:16:00 -0600 > From: Owen Densmore <[hidden email]> > Subject: [FRIAM] Multimedia Stunts for Friam/WedTech > To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Friam <[hidden email]> > Message-ID: <[hidden email]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > > Tom and Nick mentioned wanting a way to capture Friam and/or WedTech > meetings via some sort of multimedia stunt. We've looked at this > sort of thing a few times. Turns out to be difficult to get right: > you have to have a very specific scenario in mind and the right sort > of HW/SW to make it all work. > > First, we need to decide on which of the two is more important: Friam > or WedTech. As Kim pointed out, WedTech would be easy at one level: > record the session and make them available on the web. This would be > non-interactive, but at least let folks know what happened at a given > meeting. It could even be "live" fairly easily too. The downside > would be that WedTechs are fairly informal and not regularly scheduled. > > I think a non-interactive version of Friam would be disappointing: > it's far to interactive for a static capture to be very useful. > > Stephen and I spent a couple of days looking at the Friam interactive > scenario. One stunt is to have a non-computer device that is so > automatic that it no hassle to manage. We've tried both iVisit and > Skype and they require too much fussing and become intrusive. But > using something like newly emerging devices: > http://www.dlink.com/products/category.asp?cid=39&sec=0 > http://www.dlink.com/products/?sec=0&pid=342 > http://www.wgate.com/ojo/ > .. just might be able to work. Stephen had a great metaphor: a > Parrot that one of us had on our shoulder that would let a remote > person experience what the parrot holder was doing. We might even > have two of them to capture multiple conversations. > > I'd be interested in anyone's experience with this sort of thing. > I'm willing to toss a few bucks at trying the latest gadgets. > > -- Owen > > Owen Densmore - http://backspaces.net - http://redfish.com > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 18:26:42 -0700 > From: J T Johnson <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Multimedia Stunts for Friam/WedTech > To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group > <[hidden email]> > Message-ID: <[hidden email]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Owen: > > I have in my hand a paid-for CD of software called "Channelstorm." (see > www.channelstorm.com <http://www.channelstorm.com>) > I'll bring it Friday for you to install and evaluate. > > - It will do live streaming and/or capture the images to a HD. > - It will also do window-in-window to simultaneously PPt slides and > the speaker's grand self. > - This would not, I should think, be appropriate for FRIAM and its > dynamic-to-the-max character, but it might be of interest for the > presentations. > > (Apologies to all: I didn't realize Nick and I were having that conversation > in public.) > > -tom > > On 8/8/05, Owen Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > Tom and Nick mentioned wanting a way to capture Friam and/or WedTech > > meetings via some sort of multimedia stunt. We've looked at this > > sort of thing a few times. Turns out to be difficult to get right: > > you have to have a very specific scenario in mind and the right sort > > of HW/SW to make it all work. > > > > First, we need to decide on which of the two is more important: Friam > > or WedTech. As Kim pointed out, WedTech would be easy at one level: > > record the session and make them available on the web. This would be > > non-interactive, but at least let folks know what happened at a given > > meeting. It could even be "live" fairly easily too. The downside > > would be that WedTechs are fairly informal and not regularly scheduled. > > > > I think a non-interactive version of Friam would be disappointing: > > it's far to interactive for a static capture to be very useful. > > > > Stephen and I spent a couple of days looking at the Friam interactive > > scenario. One stunt is to have a non-computer device that is so > > automatic that it no hassle to manage. We've tried both iVisit and > > Skype and they require too much fussing and become intrusive. But > > using something like newly emerging devices: > > http://www.dlink.com/products/category.asp?cid=39&sec=0 > > http://www.dlink.com/products/?sec=0&pid=342 > > http://www.wgate.com/ojo/ > > .. just might be able to work. Stephen had a great metaphor: a > > Parrot that one of us had on our shoulder that would let a remote > > person experience what the parrot holder was doing. We might even > > have two of them to capture multiple conversations. > > > > I'd be interested in anyone's experience with this sort of thing. > > I'm willing to toss a few bucks at trying the latest gadgets. > > > > -- Owen > > > > Owen Densmore - http://backspaces.net - http://redfish.com > > > > > > > > ============================================================ > > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > > Meets Fridays 9:30a-11:30 at ad hoc locations > > Lecture schedule, archives, unsubscribe, etc.: > > http://www.friam.org > > > > > > -- > ============================================== > J. T. Johnson > Institute for Analytic Journalism > www.analyticjournalism.com <http://www.analyticjournalism.com> > 505.577.6482(c) 415.775.2530(h) > http://www.jtjohnson.com [hidden email] > > "He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense." > -John McCarthy, Stanford University mathematician > ============================================== > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: tm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 20:35:55 -0600 > From: "Nicholas Thompson" <[hidden email]> > Subject: [FRIAM] RE: Friam Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 > To: "James R. Stalker, PHD [RESPR]" <[hidden email]> > Cc: Friam <[hidden email]> > Message-ID: <[hidden email]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > All > > Let's say we get everybody in rural KS a solar water heater and two one > windmills for each thousand people and bingo, they're off the grid, no. > And then we put a giant water tower in the middle of town, and when we > arent drawing electricity, we pump water from the Ogalalla Aquifer up into > the tower and take some electricity back out as we let it down. Also, in > the winter, could we use some of that electricity to draw heat out of teh > aquifer for heating. Also where is professor Whyte (sp?) when we need > him? How much power do we save by not running it down long transmission > lines? While we are at it, can we put cell phone transpnders on all the > windmills? Since they are wired to all the houses, can we use them for > cable access points? Seems like there must be a damn energy Department > grant in here somewhere. > > I am sorry. This is surely old stuff to the rest of you, but spending 48 > hours in a tent in Sublette KS makes you think about stuff like this. > Seems like KS is a perpetual motion machine. > > > > How much > > Nicholas S. Thompson > Professor of Psychology and Ethology > Clark University > [hidden email] > http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/ > [hidden email] > > > > [Original Message] > > From: James R. Stalker, PHD [RESPR] <[hidden email]> > > To: <[hidden email]> > > Date: 8/8/2005 7:55:59 PM > > Subject: RE: Friam Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 > > > > Nick, > > > > See my comments below. > > > > Regards, > > > > James > > > > >-- Original Message -- > > >Reply-To: [hidden email] > > >From: "Nicholas Thompson" <[hidden email]> > > >To: "James R. Stalker, PHD [RESPR]" <[hidden email]> > > >Subject: RE: Friam Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 > > >Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 07:54:53 -0600 > > > > > > > > >Hi James, > > > > > >Yes, indeed. I found that fascinating. And thanks for your kind > words. > > > > > Thanks. > > > > >I would love it if from time to time you put some weather or fluid > dynamics > > >problems up for people to think about and discuss, things you are > worrying > > >about or wondering about. I have always been glad I have done this, > often > > >receiving replies from all over the world from the list. If you are > > >to put dumb questions up, I will put them up in my own name. Dumb > > >questions often get the most interesting and useful answers. > > > > > I do not worry or wonder about things, especially things about weather or > > fluids. I pretty much know everything there is to know! You are welcome > > to put up questions and I will try to answer them. > > > > >We saw a huge windmill array in the Midwest ... I forget where .... and > > >I > > >thought of you. With all the wind we experienced while we were stuck > > in > > >KS I cannot think of any reason why rural KS should bother to import > power. > > KS has the third most wind resource in the country according to some > not-so-good > > wind maps. > > > > >How much do those suckers generate? > > Let's see. One 1-MW wind turbine generates enough energy to power about > > 400 average homes. A 1-MW system costs about $1 million fully > > > > How many would be required to generate > > >power for a rural town of a thousand. How much power is lost by having > > >to > > >ship it from wherever they ship it from? Probably all trivial, but I > like > > >the idea of every KS town having its windmill as well as its water tower. > > > > > Please see the answers above. > > > > > > > >When I think of complexity, I think not only of nonlinearity but beyond > > to > > >emergence. Not only are the things that are produced orders of magnitude > > >different from my expectation; they are entirely different things > > >altogether. > > I undestand why you think beyond nonlinearity to emergence. However, just > > remember that there is no clear way out of nonlinearity to emergence as > > you already pointed out above. The presumed states you reach (or the > conclusions > > you make) about the emerging organization are not unique! I will let you > > ponder over this a bit. > > > > > > > >Nicholas S. Thompson > > >Professor of Psychology and Ethology > > >Clark University > > >[hidden email] > > >http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/ > > > [hidden email] > > > > > > > > >> [Original Message] > > >> From: James R. Stalker, PHD [RESPR] <[hidden email]> > > >> To: Nicholas Thompson <[hidden email]> > > >> Date: 8/7/2005 8:31:39 PM > > >> Subject: RE: Friam Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 > > >> > > >> Nick, > > >> > > >> Here is what I sent about myself. I thought it was posted to friam > > >> I am not sure why you didn't receive it. More soon. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> James > > >> > > >> >-- Original Message -- > > >> >Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:01:31 -0700 (PDT) > > >> >From: [hidden email] > > >> >Subject: Friam Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 > > >> >To: [hidden email] > > >> >Reply-To: [hidden email] > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >Send Friam mailing list submissions to > > >> > [hidden email] > > >> > > > >> >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > >> > http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > > >> >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > >> > [hidden email] > > >> > > > >> >You can reach the person managing the list at > > >> > [hidden email] > > >> > > > >> >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > >> >than "Re: Contents of Friam digest..." > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >Today's Topics: > > >> > > > >> > 1. RE:Self-introduction (James Stalker) > > >> > (James R. Stalker, PHD [RESPR]) > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > > >> >Message: 1 > > >> >Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:54:03 -0600 > > >> >From: "James R. Stalker, PHD [RESPR]" <[hidden email]> > > >> >Subject: [FRIAM] RE:Self-introduction (James Stalker) > > >> >To: [hidden email] > > >> >Message-ID: <[hidden email]> > > >> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > >> > > > >> >Fellow Friamers, > > >> > > > >> >I started attending the Friam meetings since late May of this year. > > Nick > > >> >Thompson was instrumental in making me take a closer look at this > Forum. > > >> >Some of the initial discussions with Nick about weather and stuff > > >> led > > >> >to the much needed seriousness on my part to attend these meetings. > > Note > > >> >that I have been living in Santa Fe since 1998, but never took the > Forum > > >> >seriously. Thank you, Nick! > > >> > > > >> >I am glad I finally made the decision to get involved. I have met a > > lot > > >> >of you fine folks in some of these meetings and presented a WedTech > > talk > > >> >(see www.redfish.com/friam/ for details, hosted by Stephen Guerin) > that > > >> >included an overview of my regional weather forecasting company, > > >> (Regional > > >> >Earth System Predictability Research), based in Santa Fe. > > >> > > > >> >I have professional background in Mechanical Engineering (BS & MS > > >degrees), > > >> >computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and Atmospheric Sciences (MS & PHD > > >> degrees), > > >> >severe local storms (SLS), and was a Technical Staff Scientist > > >> >for a number of years at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) until > > >2003. > > >> > > > >> >I have developed high-resolution atmospheric modeling capabilities and > > >> parallel > > >> >computing resources (e.g., I built our parallel cluster using my own > > >configuration > > >> >strategies) to run realtime forecasts at RESPR. Currently, we are > > >focusing > > >> >on the wind energy sector with our model wind assessment and > short-term > > >> >forecast products and wind project consulting services. Additionally, > > >I > > >> >would like to take this opportunity to mention that we have an > aggressive > > >> >business plan to penetrate the wind market with our above products and > > >> services > > >> >and currently are open to equity investment from compatible investors. > > >> > > > >> >I had also developed a number of SBIR (Small Business Innovation > > >Research) > > >> >proposals over the past couple of years that received favorable > reviews > > >> >but never brought in funding (unfortunately). I would be excited to > > >revisit > > >> >these proposals with right strategic business partners so we could > secure > > >> >funding successfully. > > >> > > > >> >I have a lot of experience in developing computer codes using > different > > >> >languages for scientific computing, visualization, and other > > >applications. > > >> > > > >> >I am not at all expecting any of you to pick up that phone and call > > me > > >> and > > >> >say you have funding and needed some project critical work performed > > by > > >> >yesterday (would be welcome and nice, though). What I am interested > > in, > > >> >however, is to find some key business partners to develop large > projects > > >> >that all the participating businesses could benefit from. > > >> > > > >> >I hope to hear from such potential partners and also hope to meet > those > > >> >that I have not already met and interact with you all through these > > great > > >> >informal meetings. > > >> > > > >> >Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or > > >> > > > >> >Best regards, > > >> > > > >> >James Stalker > > >> > > > >> >|---------------------------------------------------- > > >> >|Dr. James R. Stalker, President & CEO > > >> >|[hidden email] > > >> >|RESPR, INC. (www.respr.com) > > >> >|P.O. Box 29493 > > >> >|Santa Fe, New Mexico 87592 > > >> >|5054387155(phone)* 5054387111(fax) > > >> >|---------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >------------------------------ > > >> > > > >> >_______________________________________________ > > >> >Friam mailing list > > >> >[hidden email] > > >> >http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >End of Friam Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 > > >> >************************************* > > >> > > >> |---------------------------------------------------- > > >> |Dr. James R. Stalker, President & CEO > > >> |[hidden email] > > >> |RESPR, INC. (www.respr.com) > > >> |P.O. Box 29493 > > >> |Santa Fe, New Mexico 87592 > > >> |5054387155(phone)* 5054387111(fax) > > >> |---------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > |---------------------------------------------------- > > |Dr. James R. Stalker, President & CEO > > |[hidden email] > > |RESPR, INC. (www.respr.com) > > |P.O. Box 29493 > > |Santa Fe, New Mexico 87592 > > |5054387155(phone)* 5054387111(fax) > > |---------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 20:37:34 -0700 > From: J T Johnson <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] RE: Friam Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 > To: [hidden email], The Friday Morning Applied Complexity > Coffee Group <[hidden email]> > Message-ID: <[hidden email]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Nick wrote: "Seems like KS is a perpetual motion machine." > > I used to live there. Kansas is a de-evolution machine. (Lawrence is the > exception.) > > -tj > > On 8/8/05, Nicholas Thompson <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > All > > > > Let's say we get everybody in rural KS a solar water heater and two one > > meg > > windmills for each thousand people and bingo, they're off the grid, no. > > And then we put a giant water tower in the middle of town, and when we > > arent drawing electricity, we pump water from the Ogalalla Aquifer up > > the tower and take some electricity back out as we let it down. Also, in > > the winter, could we use some of that electricity to draw heat out of teh > > aquifer for heating. Also where is professor Whyte (sp?) when we need > > him? How much power do we save by not running it down long transmission > > lines? While we are at it, can we put cell phone transpnders on all the > > windmills? Since they are wired to all the houses, can we use them for > > cable access points? Seems like there must be a damn energy Department > > grant in here somewhere. > > > > I am sorry. This is surely old stuff to the rest of you, but spending 48 > > hours in a tent in Sublette KS makes you think about stuff like this. > > Seems like KS is a perpetual motion machine. > > > > > > > > How much > > > > Nicholas S. Thompson > > Professor of Psychology and Ethology > > Clark University > > [hidden email] > > http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/ > > [hidden email] > > > > > > > [Original Message] > > > From: James R. Stalker, PHD [RESPR] <[hidden email]> > > > To: <[hidden email]> > > > Date: 8/8/2005 7:55:59 PM > > > Subject: RE: Friam Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 > > > > > > Nick, > > > > > > See my comments below. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > James > > > > > > >-- Original Message -- > > > >Reply-To: [hidden email] > > > >From: "Nicholas Thompson" <[hidden email]> > > > >To: "James R. Stalker, PHD [RESPR]" <[hidden email]> > > > >Subject: RE: Friam Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 > > > >Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 07:54:53 -0600 > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi James, > > > > > > > >Yes, indeed. I found that fascinating. And thanks for your kind > > words. > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > >I would love it if from time to time you put some weather or fluid > > dynamics > > > >problems up for people to think about and discuss, things you are > > worrying > > > >about or wondering about. I have always been glad I have done this, > > often > > > >receiving replies from all over the world from the list. If you are > > > >to put dumb questions up, I will put them up in my own name. Dumb > > > >questions often get the most interesting and useful answers. > > > > > > > I do not worry or wonder about things, especially things about weather > > or > > > fluids. I pretty much know everything there is to know! You are welcome > > > to put up questions and I will try to answer them. > > > > > > >We saw a huge windmill array in the Midwest ... I forget where .... and > > > >I > > > >thought of you. With all the wind we experienced while we were stuck > > > in > > > >KS I cannot think of any reason why rural KS should bother to import > > power. > > > KS has the third most wind resource in the country according to some > > not-so-good > > > wind maps. > > > > > > >How much do those suckers generate? > > > Let's see. One 1-MW wind turbine generates enough energy to power > > > 400 average homes. A 1-MW system costs about $1 million fully installed. > > > > > > How many would be required to generate > > > >power for a rural town of a thousand. How much power is lost by having > > > >to > > > >ship it from wherever they ship it from? Probably all trivial, but I > > like > > > >the idea of every KS town having its windmill as well as its water > > tower. > > > > > > > Please see the answers above. > > > > > > > > > > >When I think of complexity, I think not only of nonlinearity but > > > to > > > >emergence. Not only are the things that are produced orders of > > magnitude > > > >different from my expectation; they are entirely different things > > > >altogether. > > > I undestand why you think beyond nonlinearity to emergence. However, > > just > > > remember that there is no clear way out of nonlinearity to emergence as > > > you already pointed out above. The presumed states you reach (or the > > conclusions > > > you make) about the emerging organization are not unique! I will let you > > > ponder over this a bit. > > > > > > > > > > >Nicholas S. Thompson > > > >Professor of Psychology and Ethology > > > >Clark University > > > >[hidden email] > > > >http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/ > > > > [hidden email] > > > > > > > > > > > >> [Original Message] > > > >> From: James R. Stalker, PHD [RESPR] <[hidden email]> > > > >> To: Nicholas Thompson <[hidden email]> > > > >> Date: 8/7/2005 8:31:39 PM > > > >> Subject: RE: Friam Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 > > > >> > > > >> Nick, > > > >> > > > >> Here is what I sent about myself. I thought it was posted to friam > > and > > > >> I am not sure why you didn't receive it. More soon. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> > > > >> James > > > >> > > > >> >-- Original Message -- > > > >> >Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:01:31 -0700 (PDT) > > > >> >From: [hidden email] > > > >> >Subject: Friam Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 > > > >> >To: [hidden email] > > > >> >Reply-To: [hidden email] > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >Send Friam mailing list submissions to > > > >> > [hidden email] > > > >> > > > > >> >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > > >> > http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > > > >> >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > > >> > [hidden email] > > > >> > > > > >> >You can reach the person managing the list at > > > >> > [hidden email] > > > >> > > > > >> >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more > > > >> >than "Re: Contents of Friam digest..." > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >Today's Topics: > > > >> > > > > >> > 1. RE:Self-introduction (James Stalker) > > > >> > (James R. Stalker, PHD [RESPR]) > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > > > > >> >Message: 1 > > > >> >Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:54:03 -0600 > > > >> >From: "James R. Stalker, PHD [RESPR]" <[hidden email]> > > > >> >Subject: [FRIAM] RE:Self-introduction (James Stalker) > > > >> >To: [hidden email] > > > >> >Message-ID: <[hidden email]> > > > >> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > >> > > > > >> >Fellow Friamers, > > > >> > > > > >> >I started attending the Friam meetings since late May of this > > > Nick > > > >> >Thompson was instrumental in making me take a closer look at this > > Forum. > > > >> >Some of the initial discussions with Nick about weather and stuff > > also > > > >> led > > > >> >to the much needed seriousness on my part to attend these meetings. > > > Note > > > >> >that I have been living in Santa Fe since 1998, but never took the > > Forum > > > >> >seriously. Thank you, Nick! > > > >> > > > > >> >I am glad I finally made the decision to get involved. I have met a > > > lot > > > >> >of you fine folks in some of these meetings and presented a WedTech > > > talk > > > >> >(see www.redfish.com/friam/ <http://www.redfish.com/friam/> for > > details, hosted by Stephen Guerin) > > that > > > >> >included an overview of my regional weather forecasting company, > > RESPR > > > >> (Regional > > > >> >Earth System Predictability Research), based in Santa Fe. > > > >> > > > > >> >I have professional background in Mechanical Engineering (BS & MS > > > >degrees), > > > >> >computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and Atmospheric Sciences (MS > > PHD > > > >> degrees), > > > >> >severe local storms (SLS), and was a Technical Staff Scientist > > > >> >for a number of years at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) until > > > >2003. > > > >> > > > > >> >I have developed high-resolution atmospheric modeling capabilities > > and > > > >> parallel > > > >> >computing resources (e.g., I built our parallel cluster using my own > > > >configuration > > > >> >strategies) to run realtime forecasts at RESPR. Currently, we are > > > >focusing > > > >> >on the wind energy sector with our model wind assessment and > > short-term > > > >> >forecast products and wind project consulting services. > > Additionally, > > > >I > > > >> >would like to take this opportunity to mention that we have an > > aggressive > > > >> >business plan to penetrate the wind market with our above > > and > > > >> services > > > >> >and currently are open to equity investment from compatible > > investors. > > > >> > > > > >> >I had also developed a number of SBIR (Small Business Innovation > > > >Research) > > > >> >proposals over the past couple of years that received favorable > > reviews > > > >> >but never brought in funding (unfortunately). I would be excited > > > >revisit > > > >> >these proposals with right strategic business partners so we could > > secure > > > >> >funding successfully. > > > >> > > > > >> >I have a lot of experience in developing computer codes using > > different > > > >> >languages for scientific computing, visualization, and other > > > >applications. > > > >> > > > > >> >I am not at all expecting any of you to pick up that phone and > > > me > > > >> and > > > >> >say you have funding and needed some project critical work performed > > > by > > > >> >yesterday (would be welcome and nice, though). What I am interested > > > in, > > > >> >however, is to find some key business partners to develop large > > projects > > > >> >that all the participating businesses could benefit from. > > > >> > > > > >> >I hope to hear from such potential partners and also hope to meet > > those > > > >> >that I have not already met and interact with you all through these > > > great > > > >> >informal meetings. > > > >> > > > > >> >Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or > > comments. > > > >> > > > > >> >Best regards, > > > >> > > > > >> >James Stalker > > > >> > > > > >> >|---------------------------------------------------- > > > >> >|Dr. James R. Stalker, President & CEO > > > >> >|[hidden email] <http://respr.com> > > > >> >|RESPR, INC. (www.respr.com <http://www.respr.com>) > > > >> >|P.O. Box 29493 > > > >> >|Santa Fe, New Mexico 87592 > > > >> >|5054387155(phone)* 5054387111(fax) > > > >> >|---------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >------------------------------ > > > >> > > > > >> >_______________________________________________ > > > >> >Friam mailing list > > > >> >[hidden email] > > > >> >http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >End of Friam Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 > > > >> >************************************* > > > >> > > > >> |---------------------------------------------------- > > > >> |Dr. James R. Stalker, President & CEO > > > >> |[hidden email] <http://respr.com> > > > >> |RESPR, INC. (www.respr.com <http://www.respr.com>) > > > >> |P.O. Box 29493 > > > >> |Santa Fe, New Mexico 87592 > > > >> |5054387155(phone)* 5054387111(fax) > > > >> |---------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |---------------------------------------------------- > > > |Dr. James R. Stalker, President & CEO > > > |[hidden email] <http://respr.com> > > > |RESPR, INC. (www.respr.com <http://www.respr.com>) > > > |P.O. Box 29493 > > > |Santa Fe, New Mexico 87592 > > > |5054387155(phone)* 5054387111(fax) > > > |---------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > ============================================================ > > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > > Meets Fridays 9:30a-11:30 at ad hoc locations > > Lecture schedule, archives, unsubscribe, etc.: > > http://www.friam.org > > > > > > -- > ============================================== > J. T. Johnson > Institute for Analytic Journalism > www.analyticjournalism.com <http://www.analyticjournalism.com> > 505.577.6482(c) 415.775.2530(h) > http://www.jtjohnson.com [hidden email] > > "He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense." > -John McCarthy, Stanford University mathematician > ============================================== > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Friam mailing list > [hidden email] > http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > > > End of Friam Digest, Vol 26, Issue 5 > ************************************ |
«
Return to Friam
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |