Administrator
|
This looks pretty good: a way to use Windows, Linux, Solaris -- all
within your new Intel based Mac OS X system: http://www.parallels.com/en/products/workstation/mac/ If they can really pull this off, it is pretty world changing! I'll like the Windows part for running apps I can't get for Mac, but I'll *really* like using a Linux or Solaris distro for getting at the latest Java running on X11. That will be huge for Java developers! Ditto for folks wanting the latest Ruby, Python etc which as Open Source projects, often appear on Linux first. -- Owen Owen Densmore http://backspaces.net - http://redfish.com - http://friam.org |
Owen Densmore wrote:
> This looks pretty good: a way to use Windows, Linux, Solaris -- all > within your new Intel based Mac OS X system: > http://www.parallels.com/en/products/workstation/mac/ > > If they can really pull this off, it is pretty world changing! I'll > like the Windows part for running apps I can't get for Mac, but I'll > *really* like using a Linux or Solaris distro for getting at the > latest Java running on X11. That will be huge for Java developers! > Ditto for folks wanting the latest Ruby, Python etc which as Open > Source projects, often appear on Linux first. I can already do everything but Mac OS-X on an Intel box with VMWare. With Virtual PC (no longer supported), folks have achieved similiar goals (one fellow had 60+ OSes running on his PowerBook). Neither of these has great performance, although VMWare can be helped by hardware and some software tweaks. If this were some form of hypervisor, I'd be interested, but for now it looks like your basic virtualization. Ray Parks |
I just got a new Intel Mac and one of the first things I did was to
install Parallels Workstation. From there, I created a VM and installed Windows XP (about 30 minute install -- significantly faster than any previous XP install I have done, albeit this has been a while). Next, I created a different VM and installed Debian Linux. Both installs were entirely painless, and the performance was quite good. Basically, they felt like running on native hardware. I even had both VMs running simultaneously and performance was still fine. (I learned later that running more than one VM at a time in the current Beta version is not necessarily a good idea, though.) Heavy duty graphics acceleration is not supported (yet), so this won't be a solution for gamers. But for my purpose, namely running OS X but being able to run the occasional Windows app that is not yet supported on OS X (Garmin utilities, for instance), this is great! And as an added bonus, I now have a Linux box in my laptop bag, too! On May 9, 2006, at 9:24, Raymond C. Parks wrote: > Owen Densmore wrote: >> This looks pretty good: a way to use Windows, Linux, Solaris -- all >> within your new Intel based Mac OS X system: >> http://www.parallels.com/en/products/workstation/mac/ >> >> If they can really pull this off, it is pretty world changing! I'll >> like the Windows part for running apps I can't get for Mac, but I'll >> *really* like using a Linux or Solaris distro for getting at the >> latest Java running on X11. That will be huge for Java developers! >> Ditto for folks wanting the latest Ruby, Python etc which as Open >> Source projects, often appear on Linux first. > > I can already do everything but Mac OS-X on an Intel box with > VMWare. > With Virtual PC (no longer supported), folks have achieved similiar > goals (one fellow had 60+ OSes running on his PowerBook). Neither of > these has great performance, although VMWare can be helped by hardware > and some software tweaks. > > If this were some form of hypervisor, I'd be interested, but for > now > it looks like your basic virtualization. > > Ray Parks > > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |