NoSQL

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

NoSQL

Alfredo Covaleda Vélez
Hola

I wonder, which one is the most usable NoSQL database.  I am guessing, maybe MongoDB?

Hasta pronto

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: NoSQL

Marcus G. Daniels
On 4/21/2014 3:16 PM, Alfredo Covaleda Vélez wrote:
> I wonder, which one is the most usable NoSQL database.  I am guessing,
> maybe MongoDB?
I've used db4o for some small projects.  Works as advertised.  I don't
really have any objection to the relational approach and SQL (query
planners, etc.) but I would rather have a language-integrated, type-safe
approach like LINQ that did away with the redundant query parsing.

For example, when one query informs the next query, it would be nice to
not spend all of the time taking apart the query, an back-and-forth over
a socket (and not have to write in yet another esoteric server-side
language to integrate it in the database).

For high performance, it is hard to beat persistent hash tables in
mmap'ed memory.

Marcus



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com