I'm sure y'all have seen this post from NECSI:
http://news.mit.edu/2020/study-physics-democratic-elections-0121https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.11489https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-019-0739-6It's interesting that the arXiv.org submission is 1.25 years old and the paper's just out in Nature Physics.
From the news article (first link) 8^):
> Siegenfeld says that’s because in physics, it’s not always necessary to know the details of the underlying objects or mechanisms to be able to produce useful and meaningful results.
--
☣ uǝlƃ
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.comarchives back to 2003:
http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/FRIAM-COMIC
http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
uǝʃƃ ⊥ glen
Locked
