More Really Is Different

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

More Really Is Different

Ian P. Cook
All,

Being geographically separate from the corpus of folks on this list, the reason for this email may have already been discussed, debunked, railed at, lauded, etc. But since I don't think I've seen it on the mailing list I thought I'd take a swing at passing it on. If I've made a mis-step, my apoligies.

http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.0151

More Really is Different


In 1972, P.W.Anderson suggested that `More is Different', meaning that complex physical systems may exhibit behavior that cannot be understood only in terms of the laws governing their microscopic constituents. We strengthen this claim by proving that many macroscopic observable properties of a simple class of physical systems (the infinite periodic Ising lattice) cannot in general be derived from a microscopic description. This provides evidence that emergent behavior occurs in such systems, and indicates that even if a `theory of everything' governing all microscopic interactions were discovered, the understanding of macroscopic order is likely to require additional insights.

And commentary from NewScientist:
http://tiny.pl/srp2


-Ian


--
___________________________________
Ian P. Cook
m: 412.759.8973
jabber: [hidden email]
Y!/MSN: ian_palmer_cook
AIM: ianpalmercook
___________________________________

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: More Really Is Different

Russell Standish
I'm not sure why this result is surprising really?

Cheers

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 04:04:16PM -0400, Ian P. Cook wrote:

> All,
>
> Being geographically separate from the corpus of folks on this list, the
> reason for this email may have already been discussed, debunked, railed at,
> lauded, etc. But since I don't think I've seen it on the mailing list I
> thought I'd take a swing at passing it on. If I've made a mis-step, my
> apoligies.
>
> http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.0151
> More Really is Different Authors: Mile
> Gu<http://arxiv.org/find/cond-mat/1/au:+Gu_M/0/1/0/all/0/1>,
> Christian Weedbrook<http://arxiv.org/find/cond-mat/1/au:+Weedbrook_C/0/1/0/all/0/1>,
> Alvaro Perales<http://arxiv.org/find/cond-mat/1/au:+Perales_A/0/1/0/all/0/1>,
> Michael A. Nielsen<http://arxiv.org/find/cond-mat/1/au:+Nielsen_M/0/1/0/all/0/1>
>
> In 1972, P.W.Anderson suggested that `More is Different', meaning that
> complex physical systems may exhibit behavior that cannot be understood only
> in terms of the laws governing their microscopic constituents. We strengthen
> this claim by proving that many macroscopic observable properties of a
> simple class of physical systems (the infinite periodic Ising lattice)
> cannot in general be derived from a microscopic description. This provides
> evidence that emergent behavior occurs in such systems, and indicates that
> even if a `theory of everything' governing all microscopic interactions were
> discovered, the understanding of macroscopic order is likely to require
> additional insights.
>
> And commentary from NewScientist:
> http://tiny.pl/srp2
>
>
> -Ian
>
>
> --
> ___________________________________
> Ian P. Cook
> m: 412.759.8973
> jabber: [hidden email]
> Y!/MSN: ian_palmer_cook
> AIM: ianpalmercook
> ___________________________________

> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A/Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Mathematics                        
UNSW SYDNEY 2052                 [hidden email]
Australia                                http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: More Really Is Different

Jack Leibowitz
In reply to this post by Ian P. Cook
P.W. Anderson's long-standing observations are undeniable. This doesn't exclude recognition of the value of reductionist efforts to get at scientific understanding. They go hand-in-hand. One example of the value of reductionism can be seen in the recent recognition (Nobel Prize) of three Japanese physicists . They explained how it happens that matter "overbalances" antimatter in the early universe, to make posssible our matter universe-- and creatures such as ourselves able to contemplate such questions. 
 
Jack
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 2:04 PM
Subject: [FRIAM] More Really Is Different

All,

Being geographically separate from the corpus of folks on this list, the reason for this email may have already been discussed, debunked, railed at, lauded, etc. But since I don't think I've seen it on the mailing list I thought I'd take a swing at passing it on. If I've made a mis-step, my apoligies.

http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.0151

More Really is Different


In 1972, P.W.Anderson suggested that `More is Different', meaning that complex physical systems may exhibit behavior that cannot be understood only in terms of the laws governing their microscopic constituents. We strengthen this claim by proving that many macroscopic observable properties of a simple class of physical systems (the infinite periodic Ising lattice) cannot in general be derived from a microscopic description. This provides evidence that emergent behavior occurs in such systems, and indicates that even if a `theory of everything' governing all microscopic interactions were discovered, the understanding of macroscopic order is likely to require additional insights.

And commentary from NewScientist:
http://tiny.pl/srp2


-Ian


--
___________________________________
Ian P. Cook
m: 412.759.8973
jabber: [hidden email]
Y!/MSN: ian_palmer_cook
AIM: ianpalmercook
___________________________________


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org