First, the title refers to mine own "ignorant vaporings"! I have been
following the discussion about the putative non-existence of a point and its spatial and temporal derivatives with great interest, but I must be too stupid to understand the issue. I have a smattering of mathematics; that I studied as a scholar in grad school at Cambridge University and Caltech, and wangled a Ph. D. , but consider myself very ignorant on deep Mathematics - the Queen of the Sciences. There's a lot t'know there!! One was reminded by the austere statement in the Cambridge catalog, that being granted a Ph.D only "PREPARED" students for research in the subject. But we, and LaGrange, allus considered bodies as assemblages of mass points, elastically connected. Jes like Marilyn Monroe! And those points had numerous derivatives in space and time, in many reference systems (some non-inertial) and usually, quel horreur, did not even conserve mass - think any propellant and oxidizer. And so, "prepared" or not, I spent half a century on four continents gainfully predicting the future state of vehicles plying their way through space, sky, sea or land. Usually Nature opposed, and the Gods of Vacuum, Wind, Wave and Rock oftentimes took out a vehicle, and occasionally a good pilot, too. But I was surprised at how often approximations that we knew to be pretty horrible worked well enough to get home in one piece. Consequently, I was deelited when my acquaintance, Dick Feynman (bless his quantum soul) told me that Newtonian Calculus was "just" a method of predicting the future, and much more successfully than astrologers, fortune tellers or the Biblical prophets. Given the inputs to system one can predict its future state. Magick!!!! But that's all it is. He also stated that one should not discuss physics or mathematics until one had worked professionally at it for a long time . Same reason Catholic Priests are piss poor advisors on matters sexual, or should be! Also don't discuss puzzlements in words until one has made numerical calculation that can be corroborated by test. Thirty years of brilliant orbital mechanics in the space programs have proven a solid validation of Newtonian Calculus. And, Yes, Virginia, there is a Saint Isaac, and those simple laws hold here, on the moon and everywhere else we've been able to check. So it doesn't seem to me there's no such thing as a point with various state derivatives!!! I do not suggest that other writers are wrong, and do not expect I am correct here, experience has demonstrated that being right is indeed a rare event for me. But, but, but, I wanted to express my personal professional experience through the better part of the 20th century, as simply another point of view on this arcane subject. If someone will express their puzzlement in the form of an equation, or better yet , numerical results, I will be able much more clearly to see the problem. Peter Lissaman, Da Vinci Ventures Expertise is not knowing everything, but knowing what to look for. 1454 Miracerros Loop South, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 TEL: (505) 983-7728 FAX: (505) 983-1694 ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:31:11PM -0600, Peter Lissaman wrote:
> > Thirty years of brilliant orbital mechanics in the space programs have > proven a solid validation of Newtonian Calculus. And, Yes, Virginia, there > is a Saint Isaac, and those simple laws hold here, on the moon and > everywhere else we've been able to check. So it doesn't seem to me there's > no such thing as a point with various state derivatives!!! > I don't think it is a point that has a derivative in Newtonian mechanics, but rather the trajectory of a point particle through phase space. I haven't been following this thread closely, so I may be way off-base, of course. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A/Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Mathematics UNSW SYDNEY 2052 [hidden email] Australia http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |