Thanks, Roger. Drawn in by a good pun, I read the whole thing. Thank God for the climate rebellion at the Cato Instituter! Well, thank someone, anyway.
The argument about wealth imbalance near the end left me bemused. I just didn’t quite understand it. The exposition was just a bit to quippish for my old brain. If anyone could make it clearer, I would be grateful. I thought it might be a form of the argument that a decision NOT to do something is just as much a decision as the decision TO do something.
N
Nick Thompson
[hidden email]
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Roger Frye
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:54 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: [FRIAM] Libertarian Walks into a Bear
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.comFRIAM-COMIC
http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/archives:
http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
Locked
