The Nexus 4 fiasco is the most unprofessional fuckup I've seen a large company execute since Microsoft released Windows 8.
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
Administrator
|
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Douglas Roberts <[hidden email]> wrote: The Nexus 4 fiasco is the most unprofessional fuckup I've seen a large company execute since Microsoft released Windows 8.
- OS: Google - Handset: HTC, Samsung, "an oem mfgr" - Carrier: Verizon, TMo, ...
Well, who's in charge? When I got my last phone, I thought I'd get a Galaxy but then after talking to Galaxy owners, who love the device, I found they were 2 or 3 versions behind on the OS? I asked who should supply it? I dunno. Why do you care? Well I care because I want my system managed well by one of the evil three. I thought cyanogenmod would be a "plan B" but then they have a really hard time keeping up with the hardware changes with each handset.
I'm *not* an Apple fan boy. But I will not buy any device until it is really clear who's in charge. When I finally gave up and went, again, with Apple .. it was after a conversation with Verizon. They made it VERY clear: Apple is in charge. They do the upgrades. They are the warrantee-ers. They hold the carrier in an iron grip, and own the OS and handset. And they would answer your wifi question.
Do I like this draconian mode? No. (It would be difficult to pull off your data-only stunt, I think, with iPhone) I really wanted to break with iPhone, I live in the Google Ecology and like their open mindset.
But for some reason, it may not be possible for a partnership between handset, carrier and OS. I dont really understand it, but I observer it.
I'm really sorry the N4 failed. I've wanted to "cut the cord" by buying a phone w/o contract and go with TMo even tho their signal sucks for many of the places I use my phone. Your innovative idea of data-only really was appealing.
But. Google. OEM. TMo. Not. Yet. -- Owen
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Owen Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote: This is WAY cool! Sorta cutting the cord so to speak. ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
Yes, that's what makes this whole episode so bizarre: Google owns that phone. They had LG manufacture it for them. Google owns Android - it's theirs! And they failed to make the phone work. And since it's an unlocked GSM phone, the operator is not an issue: purchase a sim card from any GSM provider and you're done! The operator has no say in the issue. Google must be completely dysfunctional. --Doug On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Owen Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote:
Doug Roberts [hidden email] [hidden email] ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |