I just did a quick fact-check upon
finding that Wozniak is one of the heavy hitter supporters of
this. He's supposedly worth $100M. So if he just threw down the
$5M, that would be like one of us throwing down $5K or maybe $50K
in some cases. So, I still don't think Lessig's campaign is
really about raising money... that is just the vehicle for raising
awareness/interest?
While I don't think it is a bad idea to (using Glen's words) "fight fire with fire" by "buying back" the right to not have elections bought and sold, I'm still puzzled as to whether we have given up the fight when we decide that such things *can* (and apparently should?) be bought and sold? Buying it back might be a good start to taking it off the market... a bit like buying up all the slaves and releasing them or hiring all the prostitutes to work as secretaries (can you pay them as well and provide all of the other perqs they are used to?). Isn't there something important to notice when we notice that money *can* buy elections which in turn buys special favors? I don't want to be totally naive and pretend that there *are not* corrupt politicians willing (eager? motivated by nothing else?) to sell their votes to the highest bidder. What I don't get is why we keep promoting them into candidacy, electing them, then letting them behave this way? And why do we as the electorate allow big-money advertising/campaigning to sway us? I *get* that if the candidate never shows her face in public, it is hard to vote for her, and that it is hard for her to show her face well and often if she doesn't have *some* cash to pay for the tour bus, the "free lunches" etc. But really? Does a *lavish* lunch buy the vote that much better than a hot-dog? Do "extremely slick" attack ads work a lot better than simple, blunt "the other guy is a big schmuck" ads? Who are we, if we are swayed by slick talk, fancy ads, expensive bribes? Or more to the point, who are we if we think *we* are above all that, but *the unwashed masses* are not? Are we left with two (or three or four) inbred, isolated choirs sitting around singing to themselves? Or does all that door-to-door (TV to TV) caroling make a difference? Apparently it does. Yes, our mechanism (unlimited campaign finance) is broken or at least lame... but isn't the fundamental problem our *culture*, a media-besotted culture who can be so easily swayed by billboards, flashy endorsements from celebrities, slick print/radio/TV ads? How did choosing our representative leaders in a democracy become a popularity contest? I *know* that some of lobbying and campaigning and advertising is in some way "necessary" in our modern culture... but what I don't get is how *we* let it be so key. And who do we become, who are we, if we let that be "just the way it is"? Of course, I have no answer to any of this beyond my own self and my immediate sphere, and even there "scant influence". - Steve It would be nice if someone here could come up with something concrete besides contributing. Rather than wait for that, I also have created a pledge page for anyone that would like to contribute to the Mayday Political Action Committee. ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
In reply to this post by Robert J. Cordingley
In March, I began working with two
(relatively) young tech entrepreneurs in the Ukraine. Aside from
their technical dominance with hard problems, they offered some
amazing social consciousness examples from their own
lives/culture.
In particular, about 4 years ago (they claim), the people (mostly middle/professional class) decided collectively (how did they negotiate this? Social/commercial media? ???) to put an end to the corruption of their bureaucracies. They collectively decided/agreed to quit paying bribes to get things done. They recognized that if they did not pay bribes, then those who were in their positions specifically *to* profit in that manner would go away pretty fast. According to them, it worked. The Ukraine is a small and agile nation compared to the ageing behemoth that is the USA, so maybe this really can't work here, but I *liked* the spirit. You don't bribe people to quit accepting bribes, for example, you cut them off at the pockets. What about a pledge to "vote for the guy/gal with the *least* financial support" or following Obama's funding demographic, "vote for the guy/gal whose *average contribution* was the smallest"? Maybe Lessig's campaign will generate this also as an awareness... maybe that is really what it is about... if so... more power to him... I'll send him a buck. And keep on harping. Carry on, - Steve Dare I say, as expected, offered an opportunity to actual do something, many (the 91%?) keep explaining (debate back and forth) why one should do nothing. ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
In reply to this post by Joe Spinden
There are myriad ways to contribute. I listed two URLs before that exemplify ways to _work_ on the problem, rather than just tossing some spare change at someone or putting up a web page to help funnel spare change. Some other ways to help include the many efforts to make debate an actual thing (as opposed to the silliness we now call both online discussion and organized candidate debates). You can also spend your time working on simulations of government and social systems. Or you can spend your time working on community driven investigative journalism ... or open source everything. All of these things (and more) have been posted on this very list. To imply that nobody on this list has come up with anything more concrete than tossing a few coins to a lawyer is a bit disingenuous. And, for whatever it's worth, Steve is right. Not only can we do both, toss some spare change at Lessig _and_ discuss whether that spare change will be used effectively. But that PAC is most likely _designed_ to cause discussion over and above collecting spare change ... at least as long as the discussion isn't solely to _shame_ other discussants. On 07/02/2014 06:54 AM, Joseph Spinden wrote: > It would be nice if someone here could come up with something concrete > besides contributing. Rather than wait for that, I also have created a > pledge page <https://my.mayday.us/t/c257-Joseph-Spinden/> for anyone > that would like to contribute to the Mayday Political Action Committee > <https://mayday.us/>. -- ⇒⇐ glen e. p. ropella I have gazed beyond today ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
In reply to this post by Robert J. Cordingley
On 07/01/2014 09:22 PM, Robert J. Cordingley wrote:
> Dare I say, as expected, offered an opportunity to actual do something, > many (the 91%?) keep explaining (debate back and forth) why one should > do nothing. You're being ridiculous, here. Do you really think talking about whether and how Lessig's campaign will work is "explaining why one should do nothing"? Should we all just daydream about a better day without also thinking through how it would actually work? -- ⇒⇐ glen e. p. ropella Somewhere, nowhere all ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
In reply to this post by glen ropella
On 07/02/2014 08:33 AM, glen wrote:
> All of these things (and more) have been posted on this very list. Here's one way to contribute that I haven't seen on the list (via the reddit ama Joe posted), though I could have simply missed it: https://legalinformatics.wordpress.com/tag/gitlaw/ https://blog.abevoelker.com/gitlaw-github-for-laws-and-legal-documents-a-tourniquet-for-american-liberty/ -- ⇒⇐ glen e. p. ropella Well there is the answer on the tip of my tongue ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
While I don't believe that *every* problem can be solved with a source
code repository, this does seem like a very positive example of what the tech world really does have to offer to the legal/political world. But just one tiny cautionary reminder: Remember how we used to believe that Open Source was bulletproof because *so many people* were reviewing it? And then the big-fat-holes in OpenSSL showed up. Getting our legislation up on a source code control system is killer and important and valuable... but then we DO have to make sure take advantage of that level of transparency. > On 07/02/2014 08:33 AM, glen wrote: >> All of these things (and more) have been posted on this very list. > > Here's one way to contribute that I haven't seen on the list (via the > reddit ama Joe posted), though I could have simply missed it: > > https://legalinformatics.wordpress.com/tag/gitlaw/ > > https://blog.abevoelker.com/gitlaw-github-for-laws-and-legal-documents-a-tourniquet-for-american-liberty/ > > ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
In reply to this post by glen ropella
OK, go ahead debate away, you've got till July 4 to let us know if it
will work or not. Good luck! Meanwhile (perhaps echoing Joe's sentiment), who on this list can say they are actively engaged in productive work (Complexity based or otherwise) to reduce the influence of money in US politics? (95% of US population agree its got out of hand.) Please share what you can and what S.T.E.M. skills are being used. Possibly, there are others here who can help with such initiatives. Robert C On 7/2/14 9:35 AM, glen wrote: > On 07/01/2014 09:22 PM, Robert J. Cordingley wrote: >> Dare I say, as expected, offered an opportunity to actual do something, >> many (the 91%?) keep explaining (debate back and forth) why one should >> do nothing. > > You're being ridiculous, here. Do you really think talking about > whether and how Lessig's campaign will work is "explaining why one > should do nothing"? Should we all just daydream about a better day > without also thinking through how it would actually work? > ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
On 07/02/2014 03:45 PM, Robert J. Cordingley wrote:
> OK, go ahead debate away, you've got till July 4 to let us know if it > will work or not. Good luck! No, actually, we have plenty of time beyond 7/4. Please see https://mayday.us/. > Meanwhile (perhaps echoing Joe's sentiment), who on this list can say > they are actively engaged in productive work (Complexity based or > otherwise) to reduce the influence of money in US politics? (95% of US > population agree its got out of hand.) Please share what you can and > what S.T.E.M. skills are being used. Possibly, there are others here > who can help with such initiatives. http://oegov.org/ -- ⇒⇐ glen e. p. ropella Radioactive, don't come near it. ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
Administrator
|
You meant it goes beyond 7/4?
My understanding is the *matching* fund is what is important .. if mayday gets $5M by 7/4, it gets matched by several wealthy folks. I didn't see anything on the site about extending beyond 7/4. I do know that when you pledge, you get to say "keep it anyway" if the goal is not made. But the matching is where the magic is.
The map at
shows pledges by zip code. Mine, 87505, shows 9 pledges for $485. Nine pledges seems sorta puny. -- Owen
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
Administrator
|
Is this what you mean?
For 2014, our goal is to create a $12 million fund...
They don't mean by year's end, they mean for the midterm elections, so really there's not a lot of time left. -- Owen On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Owen Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote:
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
On 07/02/2014 04:50 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
> Is this what you mean? > For 2014, our goal is to create a $12 million fund... > > They don't mean by year's end, they mean for the midterm elections, so > really there's not a lot of time left. Yes, there's plenty of time to think about, discuss, and debate whether or not it will work, whether or not the goal is met. My point was that Robert's "you have till 7/4 to let us know if it will work or not" was just as ridiculous as his earlier claim that discussing how the money will be used and whether or not it will work is "explaining why one should do nothing". And you don't even need to read the reddit ama. You can infer that the supporters and advocates are not simply going to throw up their hands and go home if the goal isn't met. Further, as has been pointed out, $5M or even $100M probably won't make much of a dent. So, I'm with Steve on this one. The PAC is not solely about getting people elected and holding them accountable. It's also about raising the issue in our minds and, thereby, forcing it on whatever representatives happen to be elected ... and I think _that's_ where the magic is. -- ⇒⇐ glen e. p. ropella And a place in my head for you ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
Yes, the PAC is about awareness. It's also a way to determine how much support can be generated. Failure to reach the 7/4 goal suggests that there may not be enough public outrage (or even just interest) to get the job done. I would find that very disappointing. I'm sure that Lessig won't stop if he doesn't get the money by 7/4. But he may step back and decide that this strategy (building mass support) failed and that another approach is needed.
-- Russ Abbott _____________________________________________ Professor, Computer Science California State University, Los Angeles Google voice: 747-999-5105; CS Dept.: 323-343-6690 Google+: http://GPlus.to/RussAbbott,
CS Wiki and the courses I teach.
A draft of "Abstractions and Implementations."
How the Fed can fix the economy (2 pages): ssrn.com/abstract=1977688.
_____________________________________________ On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:01 PM, glen <[hidden email]> wrote:
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
In reply to this post by Owen Densmore
On 07/02/2014 04:47 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
> The map at > https://mayday.us/your-donations/ > shows pledges by zip code. Mine, 87505, shows 9 pledges for $485. Nine > pledges seems sorta puny. My zip is only doing slightly better at 19 donations for $1135. -- ⇒⇐ glen e. p. ropella Shaven like a banker, lilac vegetal ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
In reply to this post by Owen Densmore
501, 505, 507 and 508mustered 29 and $1,375... my own "team" of 506 and 544 mustered $685 with 12 pledges c'mon slackers! double down! Let's buy our government back! ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
Administrator
|
Dude! I'm so on it! Quad down.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Steve Smith <[hidden email]> wrote:
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
Administrator
|
Hey, they're at $4,608,104, just $391,896 from their target! Maybe? .... On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Owen Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote:
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
Based on Owen's number at 3:48 pm when I received the email and just
now at 4:12 pm when it was $340,190 to go, seems like folks are
pledging at the rate of about $106,765/hr which means they'll hit
$5m in about 3-4 hours! Make it so!
Robert C PS I upped my pledge. On 7/4/14 3:48 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
Correction - typo: it was $349,190. Math was still ok - I think. R
On 7/4/14 4:20 PM, Robert J. Cordingley
wrote:
Based on Owen's number at 3:48 pm when I received the email and just now at 4:12 pm when it was $340,190 to go, seems like folks are pledging at the rate of about $106,765/hr which means they'll hit $5m in about 3-4 hours! Make it so! ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
In reply to this post by Robert J. Cordingley
A better projection:
X axis is Mountain Time today. Robert On 7/4/14 4:20 PM, Robert J. Cordingley
wrote:
Based on Owen's number at 3:48 pm when I received the email and just now at 4:12 pm when it was $340,190 to go, seems like folks are pledging at the rate of about $106,765/hr which means they'll hit $5m in about 3-4 hours! Make it so! ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
Administrator
|
Nice. And a good thing they're using Hawaiian time!
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Robert J. Cordingley <[hidden email]> wrote:
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |