Ho, Hum. Another Day, Another Blog Post Critical of Google

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
34 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Ho, Hum. Another Day, Another Blog Post Critical of Google

Douglas Roberts-2
Bonus points for environmentally-friendly re-use of other people's rants, Arlo.


On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Arlo Barnes <[hidden email]> wrote:
I propose a new, potentially lengthy discussion topic for FRIAM:  why, and/or why not plain ASCII text email readers are/are not superior to html readers.
Points awarded for verbosity.
Points detracted for succinctness.
You have been advised.
What are the points awarded/detracted for using other people's arguments?

versus

-Arlo James Barnes

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com



--
Doug Roberts
[hidden email]

505-455-7333 - Office
505-672-8213 - Mobile

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Ho, Hum. Another Day, Another Blog Post Critical of Google

Douglas Roberts-2
Although I must point out that our two ASCII emailers will never see this...


On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Douglas Roberts <[hidden email]> wrote:
Bonus points for environmentally-friendly re-use of other people's rants, Arlo.


On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Arlo Barnes <[hidden email]> wrote:
I propose a new, potentially lengthy discussion topic for FRIAM:  why, and/or why not plain ASCII text email readers are/are not superior to html readers.
Points awarded for verbosity.
Points detracted for succinctness.
You have been advised.
What are the points awarded/detracted for using other people's arguments?

versus

-Arlo James Barnes

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com



--
Doug Roberts
[hidden email]

<a href="tel:505-455-7333" value="+15054557333" target="_blank">505-455-7333 - Office
<a href="tel:505-672-8213" value="+15056728213" target="_blank">505-672-8213 - Mobile



--
Doug Roberts
[hidden email]

505-455-7333 - Office
505-672-8213 - Mobile

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Ho, Hum. Another Day, Another Blog Post Critical of Google

glen ep ropella
On 03/16/2013 02:25 PM, Douglas Roberts wrote:
> Although I must point out that our two ASCII emailers will never see this...

Actually, I did click on Arlo's links because I could _infer_ the
contents of the web pages by the URL, something I have trouble doing
with your URLs.

>> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Arlo Barnes <[hidden email]>wrote:
>>
>>> fASCIIsm - Everything2.com <http://everything2.com/title/fASCIIsm>
>>> versus
>>> www.textfiles.com/100/whytext.oct
>>>
>>> -Arlo James Barnes


--
glen e. p. ropella  http://tempusdictum.com  971-255-2847

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

fASCIIsm and half-ASCII users.

Steve Smith
In reply to this post by Arlo Barnes
Arlo -
What are the points awarded/detracted for using other people's arguments?

versus

-Arlo James Barnes
How about points for stirring Doug *and* Glen up at the same time?  Score!

I recently noticed a fASCIIsm yet more extreme.  It is not new, but in the light of our whining about whether ASCII should be enough (not unlike whining about the time/clock change?).

I call it half-ASCII.  When people find it too hard or unnecessary to use Case... and sometimes even punctuation (or correct spelling or grammar!). They only use (much less than) *half* of the ASCII character set.  Most recently, it was a woman correspondent who is not merely a regular (and articulate) blogger but is also a published book author.  

She began her ALL CAPS-SOUNDS-LIKE-SHOUTING message by cautioning me that she was NOT SHOUTING, she just preferred ALL CAPS because it was easier for her to SEE (apparently).   None of her books nor blog posts were written in ALL CAPS, so I have to assume that she has "people for that"... copy editors, etc. who can add all the appropriate clues to make it easy to gather.

I tried, I swear I did, to not hear her message as shouting... but finally gave over to shoving it all into *lower case* wherein I found her to no longer seem to be belligerent but now rather semi-literate and timid...  hmmm....  same *content*, different *form* and it was rather difficult (impossible) to read her message as she must have conceived it... the BELLIGERENT and the _timid_ version just didn't sound like her writing.  I finally settled for some mangled average between the two.  I was SHOCKED that someone as (otherwise) sophisticated didn't realize the effect of writing in ALL CAPS ALL THE TIME!  I even suspected it was a test. 

In the early days of developing WSIWYG text/graphics tools, I remember the shock I felt that letting people write *rough drafts* with full formatting yielded all kinds of unintended consequences.   This was before we fired all our copyeditors and even typesetters... so there were still professionals helping make sure the *final product* was of high quality.  Suddenly I found myself reading (for content, not format) my peers' work *formatted* as if it were a finished product (with plenty of formatting errors along with spelling, grammar, punctuation, emphasis, nuance, etc.).  It was really eerie!   Cognitive Dissonance.  I *longed* for a tool that had just enough smarts in it to not allow the rough draft to have any more formatting than straight ASCII, and then gradually introduce more sophisticated formatting as the status of the revisions evolved.   I still do... but it ain't happening.   I've worked with teams writing together who by convention eschew formatting until after the content is 90% hammered out.  I *much* prefer to work with formatted text myself, but don't like the confusion I feel when someone throws me text that is still "stream-of-consciousness" with "stream-of-consciousness" formatting as well as content.

Unsurprisingly, I prefer CamelCode style in my code as well.  I'll cope with those who like to live in FLAT^H^H^HASCII-Land... and even those in Half-ASCII-Land... it's really only a minor inconvenience.  And while I'm quite capable of clicking through a weakly identified link/URL, I also appreciate it when the author/submitter offers a hint of why I would want to, where I might go, etc...  

- Steve







============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: fASCIIsm and half-ASCII users.

Nick Thompson

Steve, 

 

Perhaps the all caps person is reacting to the work of Archie the Cockroach, who, like e.e. Cummings wrote only in lower case because, unlike e.e. Cummings (presumably), he could only press letters by leaping on the keys one by one.  (I guess, if the typewriter had been in cap locks mode when he found it, Archie would have composed his poems in UPPER CASE, like the correspondent we are discussing. 

 

Archie’s most famous poem is a paean for the cat’s life, written in honor of and in the voice of his very good friend, Mehitabel, the alley at.  I quote in part:

 

I once was an innocent kit
wotthehell wotthehell
with a ribbon my neck to fit
and bells tied onto it
o wotthehell wotthehell
but a maltese cat came by
with a come hither look in his eye
and a song that soared to the sky
and wotthehell wotthehell
and i followed adown the street
the pad of his rhythmical feet
o permit me again to repeat
wotthehell wotthehell

my youth i shall never forget
but there s nothing i really regret
wotthehell wotthehell
there s a dance in the old dame yet
toujours gai toujours gai

By the way, in case any of you are still with me, my (windows) computer stopped doing caps lock willingly, about two months ago.  Now, I have to wait 5 seconds for capslock to take effect, and then five seconds more, after I am done with it.  Microsoft help files suggest that this small problem can be corrected easily by following instructions that seemed to amount to first hitting my computer with a hammer and then reformatting my hard drive.  I wonder if any of you had a less drastic solution. 

 

Nick

 

From: Friam [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 9:21 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: [FRIAM] fASCIIsm and half-ASCII users.

 

Arlo -

What are the points awarded/detracted for using other people's arguments?

 

versus

 

-Arlo James Barnes

How about points for stirring Doug *and* Glen up at the same time?  Score!

I recently noticed a fASCIIsm yet more extreme.  It is not new, but in the light of our whining about whether ASCII should be enough (not unlike whining about the time/clock change?).

I call it half-ASCII.  When people find it too hard or unnecessary to use Case... and sometimes even punctuation (or correct spelling or grammar!). They only use (much less than) *half* of the ASCII character set.  Most recently, it was a woman correspondent who is not merely a regular (and articulate) blogger but is also a published book author.  

She began her ALL CAPS-SOUNDS-LIKE-SHOUTING message by cautioning me that she was NOT SHOUTING, she just preferred ALL CAPS because it was easier for her to SEE (apparently).   None of her books nor blog posts were written in ALL CAPS, so I have to assume that she has "people for that"... copy editors, etc. who can add all the appropriate clues to make it easy to gather.

I tried, I swear I did, to not hear her message as shouting... but finally gave over to shoving it all into *lower case* wherein I found her to no longer seem to be belligerent but now rather semi-literate and timid...  hmmm....  same *content*, different *form* and it was rather difficult (impossible) to read her message as she must have conceived it... the BELLIGERENT and the _timid_ version just didn't sound like her writing.  I finally settled for some mangled average between the two.  I was SHOCKED that someone as (otherwise) sophisticated didn't realize the effect of writing in ALL CAPS ALL THE TIME!  I even suspected it was a test. 

In the early days of developing WSIWYG text/graphics tools, I remember the shock I felt that letting people write *rough drafts* with full formatting yielded all kinds of unintended consequences.   This was before we fired all our copyeditors and even typesetters... so there were still professionals helping make sure the *final product* was of high quality.  Suddenly I found myself reading (for content, not format) my peers' work *formatted* as if it were a finished product (with plenty of formatting errors along with spelling, grammar, punctuation, emphasis, nuance, etc.).  It was really eerie!   Cognitive Dissonance.  I *longed* for a tool that had just enough smarts in it to not allow the rough draft to have any more formatting than straight ASCII, and then gradually introduce more sophisticated formatting as the status of the revisions evolved.   I still do... but it ain't happening.   I've worked with teams writing together who by convention eschew formatting until after the content is 90% hammered out.  I *much* prefer to work with formatted text myself, but don't like the confusion I feel when someone throws me text that is still "stream-of-consciousness" with "stream-of-consciousness" formatting as well as content.

Unsurprisingly, I prefer CamelCode style in my code as well.  I'll cope with those who like to live in FLAT^H^H^HASCII-Land... and even those in Half-ASCII-Land... it's really only a minor inconvenience.  And while I'm quite capable of clicking through a weakly identified link/URL, I also appreciate it when the author/submitter offers a hint of why I would want to, where I might go, etc...  

- Steve






============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: fASCIIsm and half-ASCII users.

Douglas Roberts-2
LINUX.  Or, if you prefer,
linux
.


On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Nicholas Thompson <[hidden email]> wrote:

 I wonder if any of you had a less drastic solution. 

 

Nick

 

From: Friam [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 9:21 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: [FRIAM] fASCIIsm and half-ASCII users.

 

Arlo -

What are the points awarded/detracted for using other people's arguments?

 

versus

 

-Arlo James Barnes

How about points for stirring Doug *and* Glen up at the same time?  Score!

I recently noticed a fASCIIsm yet more extreme.  It is not new, but in the light of our whining about whether ASCII should be enough (not unlike whining about the time/clock change?).

I call it half-ASCII.  When people find it too hard or unnecessary to use Case... and sometimes even punctuation (or correct spelling or grammar!). They only use (much less than) *half* of the ASCII character set.  Most recently, it was a woman correspondent who is not merely a regular (and articulate) blogger but is also a published book author.  

She began her ALL CAPS-SOUNDS-LIKE-SHOUTING message by cautioning me that she was NOT SHOUTING, she just preferred ALL CAPS because it was easier for her to SEE (apparently).   None of her books nor blog posts were written in ALL CAPS, so I have to assume that she has "people for that"... copy editors, etc. who can add all the appropriate clues to make it easy to gather.

I tried, I swear I did, to not hear her message as shouting... but finally gave over to shoving it all into *lower case* wherein I found her to no longer seem to be belligerent but now rather semi-literate and timid...  hmmm....  same *content*, different *form* and it was rather difficult (impossible) to read her message as she must have conceived it... the BELLIGERENT and the _timid_ version just didn't sound like her writing.  I finally settled for some mangled average between the two.  I was SHOCKED that someone as (otherwise) sophisticated didn't realize the effect of writing in ALL CAPS ALL THE TIME!  I even suspected it was a test. 

In the early days of developing WSIWYG text/graphics tools, I remember the shock I felt that letting people write *rough drafts* with full formatting yielded all kinds of unintended consequences.   This was before we fired all our copyeditors and even typesetters... so there were still professionals helping make sure the *final product* was of high quality.  Suddenly I found myself reading (for content, not format) my peers' work *formatted* as if it were a finished product (with plenty of formatting errors along with spelling, grammar, punctuation, emphasis, nuance, etc.).  It was really eerie!   Cognitive Dissonance.  I *longed* for a tool that had just enough smarts in it to not allow the rough draft to have any more formatting than straight ASCII, and then gradually introduce more sophisticated formatting as the status of the revisions evolved.   I still do... but it ain't happening.   I've worked with teams writing together who by convention eschew formatting until after the content is 90% hammered out.  I *much* prefer to work with formatted text myself, but don't like the confusion I feel when someone throws me text that is still "stream-of-consciousness" with "stream-of-consciousness" formatting as well as content.

Unsurprisingly, I prefer CamelCode style in my code as well.  I'll cope with those who like to live in FLAT^H^H^HASCII-Land... and even those in Half-ASCII-Land... it's really only a minor inconvenience.  And while I'm quite capable of clicking through a weakly identified link/URL, I also appreciate it when the author/submitter offers a hint of why I would want to, where I might go, etc...  

- Steve






============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com



--
Doug Roberts
[hidden email]

505-455-7333 - Office
505-672-8213 - Mobile

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: fASCIIsm and half-ASCII users.

Owen Densmore
Administrator
In reply to this post by Steve Smith
In Praise of Ascii (well, unicode .. but)

There is a very modern, entirely new technology: WYSIWIS

What is WYSIWIS you may ask, well
     What You See Is What I See

Much like its earlier sibling, WYSIWYG .. it is a contract between two
entities to agree on what is viewed.  In WYSIWYG's case, a printer and
a computer.

Think of WYSIWIS as the same, but between people, the "social" version
of WYSIWYG.

When I send you unformatted text, we have a chance of having the same
visual experience.

When one uses formatted text, a very strange phenomenon ensues: they
chose a font they like, and it's size, and all is yummy.  But alas, my
machine hath not this font, nor does it agree on what the size really
should be, for my machine hath a Different Notion of what Size might
mean.

But when using blessed Unformatted Text, all is well because I get to
choose both the font and size for they are in My Power, via the Great
Configuration of my Device.

So gentle reader, you'll see that WYSIWIS is a kindness to all and a
Great Way to get along with each other.

Amen

   -- Owen

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: fASCIIsm and half-ASCII users.

Marcus G. Daniels
On 3/17/13 9:03 AM, Owen Densmore wrote:
> So gentle reader, you'll see that WYSIWIS is a kindness to all and a
> Great Way to get along with each other.
For code, if there is to be standard formatting it should encode
information.
Like Python and Haskell, not C or Java or JavaScript.  Then there is no
room for debate about it.

Marcus

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: fASCIIsm and half-ASCII users.

Douglas Roberts-2
Python allows the developer to introduce all kinds of interesting indentation errors, as I discovered after moving some blocks of code around.

--Doug


On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Marcus G. Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:
On 3/17/13 9:03 AM, Owen Densmore wrote:
So gentle reader, you'll see that WYSIWIS is a kindness to all and a
Great Way to get along with each other.
For code, if there is to be standard formatting it should encode information.
Like Python and Haskell, not C or Java or JavaScript.  Then there is no room for debate about it.

Marcus


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com



--
Doug Roberts
[hidden email]

505-455-7333 - Office
505-672-8213 - Mobile

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: fASCIIsm and half-ASCII users.

Joshua Thorp
Hah and you get perilously close to the long standing battle of spaces or tabs?  And if tabs what should the width of a tab be?

The answer, by the way, is just say no to tabs.   Spaces all the way. :)

--joshua

On Mar 17, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Douglas Roberts <[hidden email]> wrote:

Python allows the developer to introduce all kinds of interesting indentation errors, as I discovered after moving some blocks of code around.

--Doug


On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Marcus G. Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:
On 3/17/13 9:03 AM, Owen Densmore wrote:
So gentle reader, you'll see that WYSIWIS is a kindness to all and a
Great Way to get along with each other.
For code, if there is to be standard formatting it should encode information.
Like Python and Haskell, not C or Java or JavaScript.  Then there is no room for debate about it.

Marcus


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com



--
Doug Roberts
[hidden email]

505-455-7333 - Office
505-672-8213 - Mobile
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: fASCIIsm and half-ASCII users.

Douglas Roberts-2
I usually let emacs decide the "tabs vs. spaces" issue.

Cue the vi vs. emacs war...


On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Joshua Thorp <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hah and you get perilously close to the long standing battle of spaces or tabs?  And if tabs what should the width of a tab be?

The answer, by the way, is just say no to tabs.   Spaces all the way. :)

--joshua


On Mar 17, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Douglas Roberts <[hidden email]> wrote:

Python allows the developer to introduce all kinds of interesting indentation errors, as I discovered after moving some blocks of code around.

--Doug


On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Marcus G. Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:
On 3/17/13 9:03 AM, Owen Densmore wrote:
So gentle reader, you'll see that WYSIWIS is a kindness to all and a
Great Way to get along with each other.
For code, if there is to be standard formatting it should encode information.
Like Python and Haskell, not C or Java or JavaScript.  Then there is no room for debate about it.

Marcus


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com



--
Doug Roberts
[hidden email]

<a href="tel:505-455-7333" value="+15054557333" target="_blank">505-455-7333 - Office
<a href="tel:505-672-8213" value="+15056728213" target="_blank">505-672-8213 - Mobile
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com



--
Doug Roberts
[hidden email]

505-455-7333 - Office
505-672-8213 - Mobile

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: fASCIIsm and half-ASCII users.

Marcus G. Daniels
In reply to this post by Douglas Roberts-2
On 3/17/13 9:46 AM, Douglas Roberts wrote:
> Python allows the developer to introduce all kinds of interesting
> indentation errors, as I discovered after moving some blocks of code
> around.
Right, just like don't ignore the associativity of multiplication and
division..

Marcus

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: fASCIIsm and half-ASCII users.

Douglas Roberts-2
Python takes its indentation very personal.


On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Marcus G. Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:
On 3/17/13 9:46 AM, Douglas Roberts wrote:
Python allows the developer to introduce all kinds of interesting indentation errors, as I discovered after moving some blocks of code around.
Right, just like don't ignore the associativity of multiplication and division..


Marcus

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com



--
Doug Roberts
[hidden email]

505-455-7333 - Office
505-672-8213 - Mobile

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: fASCIIsm and half-ASCII users.

Marcus G. Daniels
On 3/17/13 5:15 PM, Douglas Roberts wrote:
> Python takes its indentation very personal.
>
What is the justification is there for having for so many languages?

1) A formatting style that communicates information to human readers,
but nothing to the
interpreter or compiler.

2) A grammar that is parsed by an interpreter or a compiler.

3) denotational/axiomatic/operational semantics of the programming language

4) domain mathematics

It seems to me that any divergence between these is bad.

Marcus



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
12