Administrator
|
This is an interesting idea: LiFi .. wireless in the light spectrum rather than radio spectrum. http://www.ted.com/talks/harald_haas_wireless_data_from_every_light_bulb.html The idea is simple: using LED light bulbs, and a small modulator, the light can translate considerable amounts of data. And also stop the Tin Hat controversy. But I'm confused by one thing: how to make it work bi-directionally. If that could be solved, we might actually, via LiFi mesh networks, be able to build a "people's network" .. independent of ISPs and government control.
I suppose one solution would be hybred: WiFi in the home and LiFi for wide area. It certainly is a fascinating idea .. simply the drive to convert to LED light bulbs would save billions in electricity consumption.
-- Owen
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Owen Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote:
> This is an interesting idea: LiFi .. wireless in the light spectrum rather > than radio spectrum. > > http://www.ted.com/talks/harald_haas_wireless_data_from_every_light_bulb.html > > The idea is simple: using LED light bulbs, and a small modulator, the light > can translate considerable amounts of data. And also stop the Tin Hat > controversy. > But I'm confused by one thing: how to make it work bi-directionally. I was thinking that if you actually separated the routes of transmission from reception (use LEDs for reception, and standard RF for transmission), there could be some security gains from the fact that a cracker would have access to both (most conversations are fairly unintelligible if you don't hear the both sides). Additionally, it seems in theory that the bandwidth can be doubled as you're no longer requiring any channel to do double-duty or full-duplex. But those thoughts could totally be bone-headed... It is sort of a cool idea though.... > It certainly is a fascinating idea .. simply the drive to convert to LED > light bulbs would save billions in electricity consumption. That's a good point. mark ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
On 8/6/2011 8:34 PM, Marcos wrote:
> I was thinking that if you actually separated the routes of > transmission from reception (use LEDs for reception, and standard RF > for transmission), there could be some security gains from the fact > that a cracker would have access to both (most conversations are > fairly unintelligible if you don't hear the both sides). > Additionally, it seems in theory that the bandwidth can be doubled as > you're no longer requiring any channel to do double-duty or > full-duplex. It's done for satellite internet. Seems to be especially popular in Europe and the middle east. http://online.gulfsat.com/index.php/receive-only-1-way.html http://www.macrosat.com/oneway-internet.html Sounds like the next generation of mobile devices will use this approach too http://www.lightsquared.com/what-we-do/network/ ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |