Interesting, but I noted a number of omissions:
- 387 is labelled "???" but should be labelled "smallest non-special number"
- 391 is labelled "???" but should be labelled "smallest non-special number"
- 415 is labelled "???" but should be labelled "smallest non-special number"
- 424 is labelled "???" but should be labelled "smallest non-special number"
- etc.
-- Robert
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Owen Densmore
<[hidden email]> wrote:
A friend points out a nifty numeric site:
Begin forwarded message:
Date: July 20, 2009 9:34:37 AM MDT
Subject: What's Special About This Number?
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at
http://www.friam.org