Coincidentally, I just got this notice in the mail. (I haven't looked at the article, though.)
-- Russ
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Leslie Liang <[hidden email]>
Date: Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 12:45 PM
Subject: STLR Publication: "Historic Perspectives on Law & Science"
To:
[hidden email]
The Stanford Technology Law Review is pleased to announce the
publication of the following article:
Robin Feldman,
Historic Perspectives on Law & Science,
2009 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 1 (2009).
Law has had a long and troubled relationship with
science. The misuse of science within the legal realm, as well as our
failed attempts to make law more scientific, are well documented. The
cause of these problems, however, is less clear.
I would like to suggest that the unsatisfying relationship of law and
science can be attributed, at least in part, to law's inadequate
understanding of what constitutes science and law's inflated view of
the potential benefits of science for law. It is our failure to
understand what science knows about its own enterprise, as well as our
fervent hope that law could be something other than it is, that leads
us astray.
The full article may be accessed and downloaded in .pdf form at the
following URL:
http://stlr.stanford.edu/pdf/feldman-historic-perspectives.pdf
Copyright © 2009 Stanford Technology Law Review. All Rights Reserved.
--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
stlr-update mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/stlr-update
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at
http://www.friam.org