Evolution in varying environments

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Evolution in varying environments

Douglas Roberts-2
As the Geico caveman said,

"What?"

Doug Roberts, RTI International
droberts at rti.org
doug at parrotfarm.net
505-455-7333 - Office
505-670-8195 - Cell

Message sent via Treo Chattermail
-----Original Message-----
From: "Marcus G. Daniels" <[hidden email]>
Date: Tuesday, Aug 14, 2007 5:26 pm
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Evolution in varying environments
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>

Roger Critchlow wrote:
 I haven't read enough to see how they identify the "modules" into
 which they decompose the phenotype so they can select different
 subsets of modules on each environmental change.
It looks function composition to me.   g(f(x,y),h(w,z))  where they,
say, swap around the order of f and h in g.   In that way the evolved
boolean network must evolve to remember how g, f, and h work
independently to be efficient and coping with changes in ordering.  
Intuitively, it makes sense that changing the composition of functions
from time to time would make each function be more robust.

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org