Criminalizing Peace

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Criminalizing Peace

Paul Paryski
Somehow the fwd about Bush's exec order didn't work, so I have copied the  
text below.  Paul Paryski
 
     
 
While the American public...and the  world...was being diverted by news
stories of Dubya's  colonoscopy  scheduled for today, this, his latest executive
order,  was signed July 17,  2007...  However, blogs, blogging comments have  
been numerous...see a  sampling below.
 

 
Bush Executive Order:  Criminalizing the Antiwar  Movement
 
By Prof. Michel  Chossudovsky
 
July 20,  2007
 
The  Executive Order entitled "Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who  
Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq" provides the President with the  authority
to confiscate the assets of whoever opposes the US led  war.  
A presidential Executive  Order issued on July 17th, repeals with the stroke
of a pen  the right to dissent  and to oppose the Pentagon's military agenda
in Iraq.  
The Executive Order entitled  "Blocking Property of Certain Persons  Who
Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq" provides the President  with the authority
to confiscate the assets of  "certain persons" who  oppose the US led war in
Iraq:
"I have issued an Executive Order  blocking property of persons determined to
have committed, or to pose a  significant risk of committing, an act or acts
of violence that have the  purpose or effect of threatening the peace or
stability of Iraq or the  Government of Iraq or undermining efforts to promote
economic  reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian  
assistance to the Iraqi  people."
In substance, under this executive  order, opposing the war becomes an
illegal act.  

The  Executive Order criminalizes the antiwar movement. It is intended  to  
"blocking property" of  US citizens and organizations  actively involved in the
peace movement. It allows the Department of  Defense to interfere in
financial affairs and instruct the  Treasury to "block the property" and/or
confiscate/ freeze the assets  of "Certain Persons" involved in antiwar activities. It
targets those  "Certain Persons" in America, including civil society  
organizatioins, who oppose the Bush Administration's "peace and stability"  program in
Iraq, characterized, in plain  English, by an illegal occupation and the
continued killing of innocent  civilians.  
The Executive Order also targets  those "Certain Persons" who are
"undermining efforts to promote economic  reconstruction", or who, again in plain
English, are opposed to the  confiscation and privatization of  Iraq's oil resources,
on behalf of  the Anglo-American oil  giants.  



The order is also intended for anybody who  opposes Bush's program of  
"political reform  in Iraq", in other words, who  questions the legitimacy of an
Iraqi "government" installed by the  occupation forces.  
Moreover, those persons or  nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), who provide
bona fide humanitarian  aid to Iraqi civilians, and who are not approved by
the US Military or its  lackeys in the US sponsored Iraqi puppet government are
also liable to  have their financial assets  confiscated.    
The executive order violates the  First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the
US Constitution. It repeals one  of the fundamental tenets of  US democracy,
which is the  right to free expression and dissent. The order has not been the
object of  discussion in the US Congress. Sofar, it has not been addressed   by
the US antiwar movement, in  terms of a formal statement.

Apart from a bland Associated Press  wire report, which presents the
executive order as "an authority to use  financial sanctions", there has been no media
coverage or commentary of a  presidential decision which strikes at the heart
of the  US Constitution..  
Broader  implications  
The criminalization of the State is  when the sitting President and Vice
President use and  abuse their authority through executive orders, presidential  
directives or otherwise  to define "who are the criminals" when in  fact they
they are the criminals.  

This latest executive  order criminalizes the peace movement. It must be
viewed in relation  to various pieces of "anti-terrorist" legislation, the gamut
of  presidential and national security directives, etc., which are ultimately  
geared towards repealing constitutional government and installing martial  law
in the event of a "national  emergency"...
Excerpted from: _http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6377_
(http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6377)  
Text of the Executive Order:
_http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html_
(http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html)  
Message  to the Congress of the United States Regarding  International
Emergency Economic Powers Act _ht
tp://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-4.html_ (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-4.html)  
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Bloggers are  alert...    
From:_http://digg.com/politics/So_as_of_yesterday_If_you_protest_the_war_the_P
rez_can_take_your_stuff_
(http://digg.com/politics/So_as_of_yesterday_If_you_protest_the_war_the_Prez_can_take_your_stuff)
 
 
+357  diggs
 by _ajkxxx_ (http://digg.com/users/ajkxxx)  on _07/19/2007_
(http://digg.com/politics/So_as_of_yesterday_If_you_protest_the_war_the_Prez_can_take_your_stuf
f?t=7903154#c7903154)  
 
 
I'm  worried that no newspapers have picked up on this story. This is the
White House  Website.
This is getting scary.
 
_Hide 7  replies to this comment (most popular has 21  diggs)_
(http://digg.com/politics/So_as_of_yesterday_If_you_protest_the_war_the_Prez_can_take_your_st
uff)

 
 
 
    *   +21 diggs

 by _massivity_ (http://digg.com/users/massivity)  on _07/19/2007_
(http://digg.com/politics/So_as_of_yesterday_If_you_protest_the_war_the_Prez_can_take_you
r_stuff?t=7903154#c7905530)
 
 
Seriously.  WHY is this not front page news?
 
_View 3 replies to this comment (most popular has 18  diggs)_
(http://digg.com/politics/So_as_of_yesterday_If_you_protest_the_war_the_Prez_can_take_your_stu
ff)

 
 
    *   +3 diggs

 by _ronaldinho_ (http://digg.com/users/ronaldinho)  on _07/19/2007_
(http://digg.com/politics/So_as_of_yesterday_If_you_protest_the_war_the_Prez_can_take_y
our_stuff?t=7903154#c7907218)
 
 
it is  on Digg, but you know the mainstream media (aside from Jon Stewart and
Stephen  Colbert) are controlled by Bush
 
_View 2 replies to this comment (most popular has 3  diggs)_
(http://digg.com/politics/So_as_of_yesterday_If_you_protest_the_war_the_Prez_can_take_your_stuf
f)








************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20070722/ba319808/attachment.html