Coronavirus New Mexico numbers.xlsx

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Coronavirus New Mexico numbers.xlsx

thompnickson2

Phellow Phriammers, particularly the local congregation,

 

Attached please see Saturday’s numbers.  Still not great, but still linear.  6 new ones today. 

 

I had hoped to see a decline.

 

Robert Cordingley kindly pointed out errors in the state daily increases, which I have corrected.  The state changed the website today to make it MORE difficult to extract these numbers.  Not clear why they did that. 

 

If any body xl wise could put calculation formula in the two delta columns and send the table back to me, I might be less likely to screw this up.

 

Nick


..-. . . -.. / - .... . / -- --- .-. .-.. --- -.-. -.- ... / . .-.. --- ..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Coronavirus New Mexico numbers.xlsx (14K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Coronavirus New Mexico numbers.xlsx

Steve Smith

even though you are set up with the calculating spreadsheet, you might just surf in on this one?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1m2u81yTLS4aDSVxw0iqa0K59goP10HcAAkRSrNuoJjQ/edit#gid=0

On 4/4/20 5:57 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

Phellow Phriammers, particularly the local congregation,

 

Attached please see Saturday’s numbers.  Still not great, but still linear.  6 new ones today. 

 

I had hoped to see a decline.

 

Robert Cordingley kindly pointed out errors in the state daily increases, which I have corrected.  The state changed the website today to make it MORE difficult to extract these numbers.  Not clear why they did that. 

 

If any body xl wise could put calculation formula in the two delta columns and send the table back to me, I might be less likely to screw this up.

 

Nick


..-. . . -.. / - .... . / -- --- .-. .-.. --- -.-. -.- ... / . .-.. --- ..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

..-. . . -.. / - .... . / -- --- .-. .-.. --- -.-. -.- ... / . .-.. --- ..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Coronavirus New Mexico numbers.xlsx

thompnickson2

Hi Steve,

 

I wish there more data on clinical case histories.  Are these people who keep coming in from out of town, or out of state, even.  Our own growth rate three-day average has been steady for many days and the doubling time has fallen in Santa Fe to 8 days.  I would hate to think that 5 new cases a day (average) is  a steady state. 

 

Ugh.  I tried to get  the gang to speculate on Friday about what the intermediate steady state (between flattening the curve and vaccination) looks like.  Is there any hope that one can travel this summer?  I think the answer is emphatically no, but I wonder what you think.  Is there any world in which an 80 your old should travel to Massachusetts this summer?

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Steven A Smith
Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2020 8:36 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Coronavirus New Mexico numbers.xlsx

 

even though you are set up with the calculating spreadsheet, you might just surf in on this one?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1m2u81yTLS4aDSVxw0iqa0K59goP10HcAAkRSrNuoJjQ/edit#gid=0

On 4/4/20 5:57 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

Phellow Phriammers, particularly the local congregation,

 

Attached please see Saturday’s numbers.  Still not great, but still linear.  6 new ones today. 

 

I had hoped to see a decline.

 

Robert Cordingley kindly pointed out errors in the state daily increases, which I have corrected.  The state changed the website today to make it MORE difficult to extract these numbers.  Not clear why they did that. 

 

If any body xl wise could put calculation formula in the two delta columns and send the table back to me, I might be less likely to screw this up.

 

Nick



..-. . . -.. / - .... . / -- --- .-. .-.. --- -.-. -.- ... / . .-.. --- ..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

..-. . . -.. / - .... . / -- --- .-. .-.. --- -.-. -.- ... / . .-.. --- ..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/