Birdies do the right thing!
Locked
 
|
Yes, as always, Steve is correct. In my 1971 paper I included some stability calculations indicating that for a flyer moving ahead of the Vee line things became tougher, and vice versa. The funny thing, as noted in that paper, was that the lead bird, at the apex of the Vee, had the easiest job. This caused a lotta comment by ornithologists who had observed that the lead position was normally assumed by the oldest and senior bird. They asked, "Why would the strongest take the easiest job?". My cynical answer was, "Twas ever thus, for Birds and Men!" Peter Lissaman, Da Vinci Ventures Expertise is not knowing everything, but knowing what to look for. 1454 Miracerros Loop South, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505,USA tel:(505)983-7728 ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
Re: Birdies do the right thing!
|
|
I'm curious to know if there is much
work showing the relative strengths of the birds and their proportionate
times spent in various positions. For example, intuitively one might
expect that weaker birds would actually take the easiest positions for longer
durations (contrary to the ornithologist's assumptions of the day);
conversely one might expect the weakest birds to be in the most difficult
positions for shorter durations than the stronger birds. I
imagine the rotational pattern to be counter-intuitive, at least
counter-intuitive to my understanding of peloton dynamics, since a weak
bird in a hard position can't simply accelerate to the easiest position at the
apex - unlike a weakening cyclist in the hardest position at the front, who can
simply decelerate and find a drafting position behind.
From this one might imagine that flock
rotation is more of a "backwards rotation" in which new effective apex
positions are created farther back in the flock. These might be initiated
by weaker birds behind the apex position, which due to weakening, gradually drop
backward at some angle (perhaps) to its previous trajectory, and
creates a new apex position for another bird (but not for the bird
that started drifting back). One might imagine events in which
such a drift backwards is lateral across to the opposite arm of the vee in
order to avoid wing collision and/or some sort of other air
instability. This might also create new or effective apex positions where a
weaker bird may be able to recuperate. These adjustments behind the
apex would also, one might imagine, force the bird in the previous apex position
also to readjust position when the imbalance in uplift on either side begins to
weaken it (if that happens).
In any event, I'm just throwing out some thoughts
here and I would be interested to know if there is much work on flock
rotational dynamics (I haven't seen much, but I haven't done an exhaustive
search).
Hugh Trenchard
----- Original Message -----
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
|
|
Alas, fundamental principles in animal behavior still tell us that animals
should act selfishly. For selection to favor weakest individual willing to be
in the hardest position, it only has to be the case that being in the hardest
position in a group is still better than being alone. The reason we would
expect the strongest individuals to be in the easiest positions is because they
can move the weak individuals over. Selection should favor strong individuals
who do not use their when they don't have to.
The only conditions under which this arrangement should be violated is when the strongest individual gains a benefit from the weaker individual's presence. Only if this last condition is satisfied could selection favor strong individual willing to do the hardest job. Of course, if fighting is costly, this must be taken into account. Eric On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 10:00 PM, "Hugh Trenchard" <[hidden email]> wrote: Eric Charles Professional Student and Assistant Professor of Psychology Penn State University Altoona, PA 16601 ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
Re: Birdies do the right thing!
|
|
One problem with that, as I see it, is that a weak
bird ending up in the hardest position simply cannot sustain it if the
strongest bird in the easiest position pushes the pace to its sustainable
maximum. At some point, sooner or later, the weak bird will fall off from
exhaustion. However, if it trails off from a certain position according to
some rate of diminishing strength (rather than a sudden physiological failure),
it alters the dynamics of the whole group and, as I hypothesize, effectively
creates other optimal positions for other birds (if not itself) - thus a
rotational pattern is induced such that somewhere in the process of the
changing formation, the weak bird eventually finds itself
in optimal or near optimal positions by which it can recover and sustain
the average speed of the group. If the rotational dynamics work along
principles like this, it is not a matter that the strongest bird can always
simply muscle its way into the best position - there will be a
continuous rotational dynamic, particularly if the bird in the easiest
position becomes isolated because all the trailing birds begin to
decelerate. Basically, I'm suggesting there are principles that drive a
rotational dynamic - it may be that some birds spend more time in certain
positions than others, but they will not be able to remain in those
positions.
Hugh
----- Original Message -----
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
«
Return to Friam
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |