Here is a development on the "who can read the scientific literature" front, if you rank computer science as part of the scientific literature:
So authors may distribute unlimited digital reprints of their own articles published in ACM (Assoc. for Computing Machinery) journals while ACM maintains the archive and keeps the statistics on downloads.
I've noticed some authors who have pre-emptively taken this liberty with Science, Nature, and other journals. They just include digital copies of the published versions of their papers on their personal web-sites for anyone to download. What the ACM is doing is better for the journals since they learn what is being downloaded, they keep an ongoing role as archival repositories of the literature, and they don't appear simply as freeloading squatters collecting rents on intellectual progress.
-- rec -- ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
Sounds like a great step forward!
-- Russ Abbott _____________________________________________
Professor, Computer Science
California State University, Los Angeles Google voice: 747-999-5105 On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Roger Critchlow <[hidden email]> wrote: Here is a development on the "who can read the scientific literature" front, if you rank computer science as part of the scientific literature: ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |