A moral obligation

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

A moral obligation

Tom Johnson
fyi

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Shawn Otto - ScienceDebate2008 team <[hidden email]>
Date: Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 4:20 PM
Subject: A moral obligation
To: tom at jtjohnson.com


 [image: Forward this newsletter to a
friend]<http://www.thedatabank.com/smFriend.asp?enid=YWFjd2M9MzUxMjMzMzU1ODg1MDA0NTExNzY5JmVtYWlsPXRvbUBqdGpvaG5zb24uY29t>

 <http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php?id=2>

Dear John ,

Every Nobel laureate we've spoken to has said the same thing: the next four
to eight years are critical and the next president has the potential to
determine the future health of all life on earth.

Last Tuesday Bill Gates testified before
Congress<http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php?id=27>saying
that on the economic front, America "is at a crossroads" and will
almost certainly become a second-rate economy without massive attention to
science & engineering in schools and changes in government policies toward
innovation.

These are dire words from people who are normally cautious in language, and
they are just two of the major questions that are getting virtually no
discussion in our electoral process.

So on March 14, we held a high-powered press conference in Philadelphia,
arguing that Hillary Clinton, John McCain, and Barack Obama have a moral
obligation to debate these issues.  It was attended by several TV and radio
crews, print journalists, supporters and some terrific kids from a local
science magnet high school.  After all, they're the ones that are going to
have to live with our failed policies.

Here's the video:

<http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php?id=22>

  The team at ScienceDebate2008.com<http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php?id=2>


Unsubscribe<http://www.thedatabank.com/smSub.asp?aacwc=351233355885004511769>|
Privacy
Policy <http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php?id=15>

[image: thedatabank, inc.] <http://www.thedatabank.com>





--
==========================================
J. T. Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalism -- Santa Fe, NM USA
www.analyticjournalism.com
505.577.6482(c) 505.473.9646(h)
http://www.jtjohnson.com tom at jtjohnson.com

"You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the
existing model obsolete."
-- Buckminster Fuller
==========================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20080315/69719706/attachment.html 

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

A moral obligation

Phil Henshaw-2
Yea, The public issues don't include the great problems.   But not even the
intellectuals seem to asking why all our solutions keep leaving us with
worse problems.  so why bother telling people we have the solution when
apparently we're not even looking for the right question yet?

 

Phil

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
Of Tom Johnson
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 8:40 PM
To: Friam at redfish. com
Subject: [FRIAM] A moral obligation

 

fyi

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Shawn Otto - ScienceDebate2008 team <[hidden email]>
Date: Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 4:20 PM
Subject: A moral obligation
To: tom at jtjohnson.com



Dear John ,

Every Nobel laureate we've spoken to has said the same thing: the next four
to eight years are critical and the next president has the potential to
determine the future health of all life on earth.

Last Tuesday Bill Gates testified
<http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php?id=27>  before Congress
saying that on the economic front, America "is at a crossroads" and will
almost certainly become a second-rate economy without massive attention to
science & engineering in schools and changes in government policies toward
innovation.

These are dire words from people who are normally cautious in language, and
they are just two of the major questions that are getting virtually no
discussion in our electoral process.

So on March 14, we held a high-powered press conference in Philadelphia,
arguing that Hillary Clinton, John McCain, and Barack Obama have a moral
obligation to debate these issues.  It was attended by several TV and radio
crews, print journalists, supporters and some terrific kids from a local
science magnet high school.  After all, they're the ones that are going to
have to live with our failed policies.

Here's the video:

The team at ScienceDebate2008.com
<http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php?id=2>

 

Unsubscribe
<http://www.thedatabank.com/smSub.asp?aacwc=351233355885004511769>  |
Privacy <http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php?id=15>  Policy

 

 <http://www.thedatabank.com> Error! Filename not specified.

 




--
==========================================
J. T. Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalism -- Santa Fe, NM USA
www.analyticjournalism.com
505.577.6482(c) 505.473.9646(h)
http://www.jtjohnson.com tom at jtjohnson.com

"You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the
existing model obsolete."
-- Buckminster Fuller
==========================================

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20080316/a8067d3d/attachment.html