A modest proposal

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

A modest proposal

plissaman

The two nuclear plants in CA, San Onofre and Diablo Canyon, produce about 4.5 GW together.   Both are coastline installations vulnerable to seismic and tsunami activity.   CA total electrical power plant capacity is about 33 GW.  In 2010 total "used capacity " for 100% full operation was about 26 GW.   If the nukes were decommissioned , the loss is not too large and would have to be covered by wheeling power from adjacent networks.  Neighbor states would like this and so should Californians.

Why not!

Peter Lissaman, Da Vinci Ventures

Expertise is not knowing everything, but knowing what to look for.

1454 Miracerros Loop South, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505,USA
tel:(505)983-7728

----- Original Message -----
From: [hidden email]
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 10:00:06 AM
Subject: Friam Digest, Vol 93, Issue 15

Send Friam mailing list submissions to
        [hidden email]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [hidden email]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [hidden email]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Friam digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Assistance sought: The meaning of constraints (Russ Abbott)
   2. Re: Assistance sought: The meaning of constraints
      ([hidden email])
   3. Re: Apocalypse in Japan (Alfredo Covaleda)

_______________________________________________
Friam mailing list
[hidden email]
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: A modest proposal

Carl Tollander
Oranges and Apples maybe?  They're different technologies (BWR vs PWR).   It does not appear that any of the current issues at Fukushima originated with the basic design, but were due to loss of supporting infrastructure (e.g., loss of grid power to the pumps, the wave washed out the diesel backups).  It would be lot cheaper to harden the backup power and do various other safety mods.    Eventually you'll want to retire the BWRs and PWRs because they'll become more expensive to operate than alternatives (including Gen IV nuclear and possibly other non-nuclear).   I don't know how long it would take to the alternatives up and running but it has to get done before 2025 when the licenses for the current plants run out.  Decommissioning one of these Gen II reactors is not just a matter of flipping a switch; it takes some years to happen (remember those nice spent fuel pools).

See http://nrc.gov/reactors/advanced.html .   Note that Hyperion is in Santa Fe (buy local!).

On 3/16/11 1:11 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

The two nuclear plants in CA, San Onofre and Diablo Canyon, produce about 4.5 GW together.   Both are coastline installations vulnerable to seismic and tsunami activity.   CA total electrical power plant capacity is about 33 GW.  In 2010 total "used capacity " for 100% full operation was about 26 GW.   If the nukes were decommissioned , the loss is not too large and would have to be covered by wheeling power from adjacent networks.  Neighbor states would like this and so should Californians.

Why not!

Peter Lissaman, Da Vinci Ventures

Expertise is not knowing everything, but knowing what to look for.

1454 Miracerros Loop South, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505,USA
tel:(505)983-7728

----- Original Message -----
From: [hidden email]
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 10:00:06 AM
Subject: Friam Digest, Vol 93, Issue 15

Send Friam mailing list submissions to
        [hidden email]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [hidden email]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [hidden email]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Friam digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Assistance sought: The meaning of constraints (Russ Abbott)
   2. Re: Assistance sought: The meaning of constraints
      ([hidden email])
   3. Re: Apocalypse in Japan (Alfredo Covaleda)

_______________________________________________
Friam mailing list
[hidden email]
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: A modest proposal

Tom Johnson
In reply to this post by plissaman
And lotsaluck in getting PG&E -- the power company -- to pay for the decomissioning.

-tj

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:11 PM, <[hidden email]> wrote:

The two nuclear plants in CA, San Onofre and Diablo Canyon, produce about 4.5 GW together.   Both are coastline installations vulnerable to seismic and tsunami activity.   CA total electrical power plant capacity is about 33 GW.  In 2010 total "used capacity " for 100% full operation was about 26 GW.   If the nukes were decommissioned , the loss is not too large and would have to be covered by wheeling power from adjacent networks.  Neighbor states would like this and so should Californians.

Why not!

Peter Lissaman, Da Vinci Ventures

Expertise is not knowing everything, but knowing what to look for.

1454 Miracerros Loop South, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505,USA
tel:<a href="tel:%28505%29983-7728" target="_blank">(505)983-7728

----- Original Message -----
From: [hidden email]
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 10:00:06 AM
Subject: Friam Digest, Vol 93, Issue 15

Send Friam mailing list submissions to
        [hidden email]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [hidden email]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [hidden email]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Friam digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Assistance sought: The meaning of constraints (Russ Abbott)
   2. Re: Assistance sought: The meaning of constraints
      ([hidden email])
   3. Re: Apocalypse in Japan (Alfredo Covaleda)

_______________________________________________
Friam mailing list
[hidden email]
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org



--
==========================================
J. T. Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalism   --   Santa Fe, NM USA
www.analyticjournalism.com
505.577.6482(c)                                    505.473.9646(h)
http://www.jtjohnson.com                  [hidden email]
==========================================

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org