A 9D model for a chaos-hyperchaos transition

[Jochen Fromm-3]

Scholarpedia http://www.scholarpedia.org is similar
to Wikipedia. The difference is that each article
is written by an expert (invited or elected),
each article is anonymously peer reviewed, and
each article has a curator or editor. We had
similar ideas for our own DCS-Wiki at
http://www.vs.uni-kassel.de/systems

What do you think of the idea Scholarpedia idea? It
is currently mainly about neuroscience, dynamical systems
and chaos theory, editor-in-chief is Eugene M. Izhikevich.
Although many articles which are not yet completed or
unfinished, it has already some interesting articles
about Attractors, ABM, Bubbling Transition and Hyperchaos.
They are written by Chaos Theory experts as Peter Ashwin,
Otto E. R?ssler, and Edward Ott.. The page about Hyperchaos
contains a 9D model for a chaos-hyperchaos transition..
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Agent_Based_Modeling
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Attractor
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Basin_of_Attraction
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Bubbling_Transition
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hyperchaos 

-J.

[Jochen Fromm-3]

Urgs, at least two slips of the pen in one post. Sorry.
Larry Sanger's new CITIZENDIUM (a compendium of knowledge
similar to Wikipedia - short for "the citizen's compendium")
at http://citizendium.org/ seems to go in a similar
direction. A Slashdot discussion can be found here
http://slashdot.org/articles/06/09/16/1421226.shtml

-J.

[Phil Henshaw-2]

for whatever my opinion is worth, 'sounds' great, but what about 'the
ruts' that scholarly thinking is so very famous for?   The more
democratic media, like Wikipedia, aren't even that successful in
eliminating those diversions seems to me.   Wouldn't 'Scholarpedia' just
move us backwards in exposing and validating independent points of view?


Phil Henshaw                       ????.?? ? `?.????
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
680 Ft. Washington Ave
NY NY 10040                      
tel: [phone]                
e-mail: pfh at synapse9.com          
explorations: www.synapse9.com    

> -----Original Message-----
> From: friam-bounces at redfish.com
> [mailto:friam-bounces at redfish.com] On Behalf Of Jochen Fromm
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 5:37 AM
> To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
> Subject: [FRIAM] A 9D model for a chaos-hyperchaos transition
>
>
>
> Scholarpedia http://www.scholarpedia.org is similar
> to Wikipedia. The difference is that each article
> is written by an expert (invited or elected),
> each article is anonymously peer reviewed, and
> each article has a curator or editor. We had
> similar ideas for our own DCS-Wiki at
> http://www.vs.uni-kassel.de/systems
>
> What do you think of the
> idea Scholarpedia idea? It
> is currently mainly about neuroscience, dynamical systems
> and chaos theory, editor-in-chief is Eugene M. Izhikevich.
> Although many articles which are not yet completed or
> unfinished, it has already some interesting articles
> about Attractors, ABM, Bubbling Transition and Hyperchaos.
> They are written by Chaos Theory experts as Peter Ashwin,
> Otto E. R?ssler, and Edward Ott.. The page about Hyperchaos
> contains a 9D model for a chaos-hyperchaos transition..
> http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Agent_Base> d_Modeling
>

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Attractor

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Basin_of_Attraction
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Bubbling_Transition
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hyperchaos 

-J.


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

[Louis Macovsky, Dynamic BioSystems]

More important than the author's name and academic stature, is that the
essential element of a scholarally posting is references and citations to
support the posting so that a reader if so desired can judge for herself the
verification and validation of the information provided.

Perhaps a posting should have an "ontological" network of
references/citations to cited information in addition to the standard *pedia
links.

Lou

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jochen Fromm" <[hidden email]>
To: "'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'"
<friam at redfish.com>
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 2:37 AM
Subject: [FRIAM] A 9D model for a chaos-hyperchaos transition



Scholarpedia http://www.scholarpedia.org is similar
to Wikipedia. The difference is that each article
is written by an expert (invited or elected),
each article is anonymously peer reviewed, and
each article has a curator or editor. We had
similar ideas for our own DCS-Wiki at
http://www.vs.uni-kassel.de/systems

What do you think of the idea Scholarpedia idea? It
is currently mainly about neuroscience, dynamical systems
and chaos theory, editor-in-chief is Eugene M. Izhikevich.
Although many articles which are not yet completed or
unfinished, it has already some interesting articles
about Attractors, ABM, Bubbling Transition and Hyperchaos.
They are written by Chaos Theory experts as Peter Ashwin,
Otto E. R?ssler, and Edward Ott.. The page about Hyperchaos
contains a 9D model for a chaos-hyperchaos transition..
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Agent_Based_Modeling
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Attractor
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Basin_of_Attraction
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Bubbling_Transition
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hyperchaos

-J.


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org 

[Robert Holmes]

Scholarpedia seems like a good idea but IMHO is let down by it's complete
lack of content. I clicked on a dozen links in the three encyclopedias they
are hosting (the encyclopedia of dynamical systems sounded fun) and all I
got was canned messages saying "This article has been reserved by Prof.
Such-and-Such" or "This article will be written by the end of August 2006"
(huh?)

Doesn't seem the most promising start....

Robert

On 11/3/06, Louis Macovsky, Dynamic BioSystems <dynbiosys at verizon.net>
wrote:

>
> More important than the author's name and academic stature, is that the
> essential element of a scholarally posting is references and citations to
> support the posting so that a reader if so desired can judge for herself
> the
> verification and validation of the information provided.
>
> Perhaps a posting should have an "ontological" network of
> references/citations to cited information in addition to the standard
> *pedia
> links.
>
> Lou
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jochen Fromm" <fromm at vs.uni-kassel.de>
> To: "'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'"
> <friam at redfish.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 2:37 AM
> Subject: [FRIAM] A 9D model for a chaos-hyperchaos transition
>
>
>
> Scholarpedia http://www.scholarpedia.org is similar
> to Wikipedia. The difference is that each article
> is written by an expert (invited or elected),
> each article is anonymously peer reviewed, and
> each article has a curator or editor. We had
> similar ideas for our own DCS-Wiki at
> http://www.vs.uni-kassel.de/systems
>
> What do you think of the idea Scholarpedia idea? It
> is currently mainly about neuroscience, dynamical systems
> and chaos theory, editor-in-chief is Eugene M. Izhikevich.
> Although many articles which are not yet completed or
> unfinished, it has already some interesting articles
> about Attractors, ABM, Bubbling Transition and Hyperchaos.
> They are written by Chaos Theory experts as Peter Ashwin,
> Otto E. R?ssler, and Edward Ott.. The page about Hyperchaos
> contains a 9D model for a chaos-hyperchaos transition..
> http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Agent_Based_Modeling
> http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Attractor
> http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Basin_of_Attraction
> http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Bubbling_Transition
> http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Hyperchaos
>
> -J.
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20061103/dd3e574b/attachment-0001.html

[Jochen Fromm-3]

 
Yes, it is nearly empty ;-) but you must admit that some
of the articles which do exist seem to be interesting.
Did you notice the huge diversity of placeholder sentences ?

This article will be written in..
To be written by the end of..
To be written shortly by..
To be written in..
To be completed.....
This will be finished in..
This article will be written after..
This article will be written by the end of summer..
Will be written in 2006..
Under construction.
This article is in progress.
This article will be written soon.
To be written shortly..
will be written shortly.
To be written by..

-J.

________________________________

From: Robert Holmes
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 5:47 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] A 9D model for a chaos-hyperchaos transition

Scholarpedia seems like a good idea but IMHO is let down by it's complete
lack of content. I clicked on a dozen links in the three encyclopedias they
are hosting (the encyclopedia of dynamical systems sounded fun) and all I
got was canned messages saying "This article has been reserved by Prof.
Such-and-Such" or "This article will be written by the end of August 2006"
(huh?)

Doesn't seem the most promising start....

Robert